Laserfiche WebLink
<br />O....'3~ 6 <br />tJ ..' ._ <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />public record were compiled. The issues were summarized by <br />paraphrasing or recording verbatim, sentences, paragraphs, and <br />even pages from the public record. The organization of the <br />issues in Section II of this report parallels the structure of the <br />Principles and Standards. The comment most frequently made on <br />an issue is presented first. Every effort was made to insure that <br />the discussion of each issue was impartial and objective and <br />reflected accurately the views expressed in the public record. In <br />some instances, similar arguments were addressed to more than <br />one issue. Hence, there may be a certain amount of redundancy <br />in the narrative. <br /> <br />Most of the respondents dealt with more than one is sue. <br />For example, an individual would suggest a specific discount rate <br />and discuss the 5-year review clause. As a result, 1 1,832 com- <br />ments on 23 issues were received from 4,782 respondents. <br />Figure 1 reflects the geographical distribution by State of the total <br />number of comments on the various issues. <br /> <br />Of the responses received by the Water Resources Council, <br />187 were from elected officials (Senators, Congressmen, <br />Governors, State legislators, Mayors); 3,121 were from indivi- <br />duals or organizations which expressed one or more points listed <br />in the "Citizen's Alert"; 1.425 were from individuals or organiza- <br />tions which expressed one or more points contained in the "Hot <br />Line, " the Blue Cards, the Texas letter, or the Great Lakes form <br />letter; and 49 were general comments. Copies of the "Citizen's <br />Alert," the "Hot Line," the Blue Cards, the Texas letter, and the <br />Great Lakes form letter follow at pages 49 to 57. <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />The chronological development of the written record pro- <br />vides some additional information. For instance, on February 25, <br />1972, a total of 391 written comments had been received; over 90 <br />percent reflected one or more points in the "Citizen's Alert" and <br />4 percent of the remaining portion reflected one or more points <br />later contained in the "Hot Line," and others. By March 3, 1972, <br />of the 516 total, 90 percent still reflected "Citizen's Alert" points <br />and 5 percent the "Hot Line" points; March 10, 1972, saw 699 <br />written comments, 89 percent containing "Citizen's Alert" points, <br />8 percent containing "Hot Line" points. The total number of <br />written comments jumped to 4,321 on April 14, 1972; roughly <br />one-third mentioned one or more of the "Hot Line" points. <br />During the entire time, the response from elected public officials <br />was between 2 and 3 percent, while general comments accounted <br />for about 1 percent of the total. <br />