My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09060
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:50:55 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:26:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407.600
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications - Kansas General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
10/4/1972
Author
Kansas Water Resourc
Title
State Water Plan Studies - Part B - Kansas Long Range Water Requirements
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The introduction of the turbine pump and the discovery of natural gas <br />in southwest Kansas helped to spur interest in irrigation; however, <br />development was relatively I imited until after World War II. The <br />availabil ity of commercial fertilizers, improved irrigation equipment, <br />and the drought of the 1950's contributed significantly to the rapid <br />increase in irrigation in the past 20 years. <br /> <br />In 1966, an estimated 1,200,000 acres were irrigated. The only major <br />irrigation developments prior to 1950 were along the Arkansas River and <br />in Scott and Grant counties. Land in the Arkansas River Valley was <br />irrigated with surface water or with water pumped from relatively <br />shallow wells. Irrigation water was obtained from deep wells in Scott <br />and Grant counties. <br /> <br />Comparison of two state maps contained in Figure 3-1 shows the spread <br />of irrigation development between 1950 and 1966. During this period, <br />most of the increased irrigation development used groundwater. Except <br />for the Bureau of Reclamation projects, which serve around 70,000 <br />acres at the present time, very I ittle new surface water development <br />has taken place. Recently, irrigation has expanded most rapidly in <br />the northwestern area of the state and is essentially all from ground- <br />water. <br /> <br />The amount of water used for irrigation in 1965 was determined by the <br />Water Resources Board for its report entitled Irrigation in Kansas. <br />Irrigation is by far the greatest water use of all categories and was <br />estimated at 2.26 mill ion acre-feet (MAF) in 1965. <br /> <br />Rural Domestic and Livestock Water Use <br /> <br />This category includes aJ I water which is withdrawn for livestock water- <br />ing and household purposes in areas which are not served by a municipal <br />warer supply. Unit figures for rural household purposes were developed <br />from the water use experience of several rural water districts, small <br />rural communities, and a few individual farmsteads. Unit water use <br />figures for I ivestock were developed by relating water use to dollar <br />value of production. <br /> <br />The amount of water used for household purposes in the rural sector <br />was estimated on the basis of water use reported by individual farmers, <br />by rural water districts in Kansas, and on the basis of comparison to <br />reported water use in cities. A sample of 33 rural water districts <br />reported a combined water use of 264 million gallons in 1965. These <br />33 districts had a total of 3,716 water service connections; the average <br />use per connection was sl ightly more than 71,000 gallons per year, or <br />approximately 65 gal Ions per capita per day (GPCD). For the base year <br />1965, people not living in incorporated cities were divided into <br />rural farm and rural nonfarm categories. The assumption was made that <br />rural nonfarm people would use three quarters of the quantity of water <br />used per person in the cities. Rural farm water use was assumed at two- <br />thirds of the urban use. This compared favorably with information on <br /> <br />20. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.