My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09054
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:50:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:25:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407.400
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications - Nebraska
State
NE
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
9/1/1968
Author
Nebraska Soil and Wa
Title
Nebraskas State Water Plan - Big Blue River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The 1960 employment was comprised of 32.6 percent on farms; .13.6 percent in_ <br />forestry, mining, construction, and manufacturing; and 53.8 percent in the trade and service <br />sector. A comparison of employment data in Table 11 shows that the agricultural industry has <br />been the only category suffering significant employment losses. However, the losses in <br />agricultural employment have been quite similar to the losses in agricultural employment in <br />the remainder of the state and nation. While there has been some growth in the other <br />employment sections, their growth has been at a slower rate than the state and national <br />trends. This illustrates that the lack of good growth in the nonagricultural sectors has caused <br />the economy of the Big Blue Basin to lag behind the growth rates of the state and the nation. <br /> <br />A comparison of the population growth of the Big Blue Basin and that of the state for <br />the past two decades indicates: <br /> <br />1. The loss of farm population in the basin has been nearly the same as the loss of <br />farm population throughout the state. <br /> <br />2. The small growth in the rural nonfarm category has been quite similar to the state <br />trend. <br /> <br />3. The 20 percent gain in urban population has been decidedly less than the nearly <br />47 percent gain for all urban areas in the state. <br /> <br />TABLE 11 <br />EMPLOYMENT IN THE BIG BLUE BASIN <br /> <br />Agriculture <br />Forestry and Mining <br />Contract Construction <br />Manufacturing <br />Transportation, Communication <br />and Public Utilities <br />Wholesale Trade <br />Retail Trade <br />Finance, Insurance, and <br />Real Estate <br />Service <br />Other <br /> <br />TOTAL <br /> <br />1950 <br />1 7,372 <br />82 <br />2,152 <br />2,771 <br /> <br />1960 <br />1 2,600 <br />47 <br />1,923 <br />3,275 <br /> <br />2,428 <br />1,284 <br />5,788 <br /> <br />953 <br />9,588 <br />738 <br />38,624 <br /> <br />2,417 <br />1,350 <br />5,487 <br /> <br />730 <br />7,584 <br />957 <br />40,902 <br /> <br />SOURCE: U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, U. S. Census of Population <br /> <br />39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.