Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The computed Apri l-July natural i nfl ow to Lake Granby <br />200,300 acre-feet. This was near the May 1 most <br />(195,000 acre-feet) runoff forecast for the April-July volume. <br /> <br />Lake Granby ended the water year wi th 295,791 acre-feet of water in <br />storage. This was 120,109 acre-feet below average, but only <br />5,391 acre-feet less than last year. <br /> <br />totaled <br />probable <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />....,; <br /> <br />..' " <br />, <br /> <br />During September, natu~al inflows were 114 <br />precipitation was 119 percent of average. <br />continued low at 7,400 acre-feet for the month, <br /> <br />percent of average and <br />Adams Tunnel diversions <br />43 percent of average. <br /> <br />A total of 14,442 acre-feet of water was pumped into Lake Granby from <br />May 16 through June 30 via Windy Gap Pumping Plant for the 1990 water year. <br /> <br />Adams Tunnel diversions totaled 216,800 acre-feet for the water year. This <br />was more than 17,800 acre-feet below average. <br /> <br />Lake Estes <br /> <br />Completed in 1949, Lake Estes (on the Big Thompson River) provides <br />regulating capacity for power purposes. The lake has a total capacity of <br />3,100 acre-feet and controls the discharge of Estes Powerplant, river <br />inflow, river outflow, and releases of water to the Foothills Power System <br />via Olympus Tunnel (550 ft3/s capacity). The Estes Powerplant contains <br />three units with a total installed capacity of 45 megawatts, with combined <br />release capability of 1,300 ft3/s. The spillway, located on the right <br />abutment, has five radial gates with a total release capabil ity of <br />21,200 ft3/s. The center gate has been automated and is controllable from <br />the Flatiron Control Center. <br /> <br />During the winter, project water is diverted through Adams and Olympus <br />Tunnels and routed through the Foothills Power System on its journey to <br />terminal storage in Carter Lake and Horsetooth Reservoir. <br /> <br />The October-January precipitation for the Big Thompson River Basin above <br />Lake Estes was below normal at 74 percent of average. The inflow into Lake <br />Estes for this period was also below normal at 75 percent of average. The <br />February 1 snowpack water content measurement was 64 percent of average <br />whi ch resulted in an April-July most probabl e runoff forecast vol ume of <br />58,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Precipitation over the Big Thompson River Basin in February was 88 percent <br />of average. Inflow was 86 percent of average and the March 1 runoff <br />forecast of the April-July volume remained at 58,000 acre-feet. . <br /> <br />Estes Park recorded the sixth highest precipitation of 3.06 inches for <br />March in 81 years of record, as precipitation over the watershed increased <br />rapidly to' 243 percent of average. A major snowstorm on March 6, 1990, <br />deposited 1 to 3 feet of wet snow along the front range. The April 1 <br />snow-water content was 12.4 inches or 115 percent of average. The <br />April-July runoff forecast volume increased to 77,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />,I <br />I <br />