Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br />o <br />c-_~ <br />(..-, <br />~ <br />CO <br /> <br />~a. tt~a~"oo <br /> <br />San Juan River Basin Hydrology Model <br />New Mexico Non-Irrigation Depletions <br /> <br />Comparison of Depletions Used in the Natural Flow Study <br />vs <br />Depletions from the Colorado River System Consumptive Uses & Losses Reports. <br /> <br />Intra <br /> <br />The San Juan River Basin Hydrology Model uses resulls of Ihe Natural Ftow Study(NF) as it's basic hydrology data set. The NF <br />based much 01 its New Mexico non-irrigation depletions on 'Northwest Unit, New MexIco Regional Waler Resources <br />Assessments, Technical Memorandum," USBR in cooperation with NM Interstate Stream Commission, December 1994. John <br />Whipple, NMISC, has recommended that NM non-irrigation depletions use resulls 01 the CU&L Reports. ThiS report compares <br />these two sets 01 depletions. <br /> <br />List of Sheets <br /> <br />Summary <br />Data - Annual Depletions by Category <br />Table I . CU&L <br />Table 2 - NF <br />Table 3 - NF minus CU&L <br />Table 4 - (NF minus CU&L) I NF . 100.0 <br />Charts <br />Figure 1 - Total Depletion, Irrigalion Depletion and Non-Irrigaton Depletion <br />Figure 2 - Reservoir Evaporation <br />Livestock & Stock Pond Evaporation <br />Urban and Rural <br />Thermal <br />Mineral <br />F&W <br /> <br />Results <br /> <br />The average annual non-irrigation depletions compare closely. The NF value 01 70,463 al and the CU&L value of 75,900 af <br />diller by about 8%. The annual values show wider descrepency. The max positive difference occurs in 1976, where the NF <br />value of 60,765al is about 12% greater than the CU&L value of 53,400 af. The maximum negative difference occurs in 1989, <br />with a NF value 01 87,212af and a CU&L value 01116,200 af, a difference of about -33%. Figure 1 compares the annual <br />values and shows that NF are the same or greater than CU&L values for Ihe first ten years, but then the CU&L values are <br />generaily greater than the NF values for the remaining twelve years. <br /> <br />Annual depletions by the six categories shown in Figure 2. We are using the same data for Thermal Power Depletions, but <br />1991 and 1992 were estimated based on preliminary data and need to be adjusted, Navajo Reservoir Evaporalion is a major <br />depletion that requires checking on the history of Area-Capacity-Elevation tables and using pan evaporation data instead of <br />standard monthly rates. The other four categories each has it's problems, mainly associtaled with how minor reservoir <br />evaporation was reported in the past. Minerat, Livestock and Stockpond Evaporalion, and Fish and Wildlife display drastic <br />dillerences for the two sets of data. <br /> <br />~I"e.e.._ <br /> <br />Ik~/or --/~/~. <br />