My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09016
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:50:40 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:24:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407
Description
Platte River Basin - General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
9/9/1968
Author
Robert E Glover
Title
Surface Water - Ground Water Interchange in the South Platte Valley Between Kersey and Julesburg Gaging Stations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br />On1915 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />(4) Average flow o~ the South Platte at Juleeburg: <br /> <br />Dille:'(19~9-l958 inol) <br />, <br />Dille: (Long time records- Presumab17 the <br />58 years mentioned elsewhere in <br />the report) <br /> <br />Crawford and Gilderslewte:5 <br />(1930 - 1955 incl - 26 years) <br /> <br />USBR data1o(!ota1s mad.by thia -.r.J.'te3r for <br />1939-1958 inel - 20 years). <br />. <br /> <br />318 700 AF/yr <br /> <br /> <br />~4O 000 AF/yr <br />269 300 AF/yr <br />324 680 AF/yr <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Details otcomputations <br /> <br />The river flows at Kersey and Julesburg were compiled from <br />published U.S. Geological Survey records. ~ <br /> <br />The reservoir seepage loss was taken from the Dille study: <br /> <br />Diversions to irrigation and storage were co',"piled for the <br />1939-1958 periOd from U. S. Bureau of Reclamationreeords. 10 <br /> <br />ConsU$ptive use was estimated from Munson's.data for 235 000 <br />acree." <br /> <br />The average return flow from irrigation and precipitation was <br />obtained by adding to the 765 440 AF/tr of diversions the <br />262 000 estimated aore feet of precipitation falling on <br />235 000 aores in a year and subtracting the 470 000 A~/yr estimated <br />for the consumptive use on 235 000 acres together with the <br />200 200 AF/yr of reservoir seepage loss. The average return flow <br />is then 357 240 AF/yr. <br /> <br />Temporary storage in the river due to changes of depth <br />associated with flow changes was estimated in the manner described <br />previously. <br /> <br />Precipitation falling on the irrigated area was considered on <br />the same basis as irrigation water since on these arBas the <br />moisture content of the s011 is maintained and rainfall can <br />penetrate to the water table with about the same facility as <br />irrif:,;ion water. On the non irrigated areas precipitation pene- <br />trat. the surface of the ground is assumed to be held near the <br />surface until it is consumed by plante or evaporation. No contri- <br />bution to the ground water from precipitation falling on the non <br />irrigated areas was therefore considered. 4 <br /> <br />The amplitude of the seasonal fluctuations of the return flow <br />originating in the applioation of irrigat~ water was estimated <br />by the methods desoribed in reference (7) . Charts needed for <br />aaking this computation ar& reproduced here as figures B and ~ . <br />An average valley width L of 4.,JIIiles or 21 120 feet was selec~ed <br />trom a study ot the data in th. USGS Water Supply Paper 1378. An <br />aquifer eonstant of OC.. , 1.50 ft2/sec was also seleoted from the <br />pump test data given in this volume. With a period T of one year <br />or 31 536 000 seconds the chart parameter beoomes <br /> <br />14fT .. 1(4)1.hR(i,~536000)_ .. " =,0.651 <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4-. <br /> <br />.,,4 <br /> <br />--"-... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.