Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />t,,?;. i <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />001912 <br /> <br />Purposes <br /> <br />Recent developments in the theory of ground water movements7 <br />offer the possibility of evaluating the interchange of surface <br />and ground waters in an irrigated valley bordering a stream. <br />It will be the purpose of this study to apply these methods to <br />the South Platte valley between the Kersey and Julesburg gaging <br />stations to determine whether the surface-water ground-water <br />interchanges in this 140 mile reach can be evaluated with the <br />accuracy needed for practical purposes. <br /> <br />Bature of the study <br /> <br />The study covers the 20 year period 1939 to 1958 inclusive. <br />Much use is made of the data of a previous study by Mr. J.M. Dille <br />dated at Fort Morgan in May 1961.' He used the records available <br />to him to evaluate the actual consumption of water by crops in <br />Water Districts 1 and 64. His study also contains much data on <br />reservoir operations and reservoir leakage in these two districts. <br /> <br />Beginning with the 20 year average flow of the river at Kersey, <br />the flow at Julesburg at the State line, about 140 miles down- <br />stream, is estimated by the following formula: <br /> <br />Flow at Julesburg : Flow at Kersey + Precipitation + reservoir <br />leakage return flow + average rate of return flow due to applica- <br />tion of irrigation water - Diversions direct to irrigation - <br />Diversions to storage in reservoirs - Water consumed by growing <br />.cro,ps :I; surface slitn-age in the river bed .:t Seasonal fluctuatioJUJ <br />~~!~'tu~~~~ ,p.#t'" ~'k-. p,~ .~.. ':-, .:_~. r <br />!he result is to: be compared with the 20 year average of the <br />observed flow ot the river past the Julesburg station. Data on <br />river flows at Kersey and Julesburg were obtained from the <br />published U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Papers. Data for <br />the 1951-1958 period comes, for example, trom Water Supply <br />Paper Io. 1730' Part 6B.Q Data on precipitation at Fort Morgan <br />was obtained from U. S. Weather Bureau summaries." Reservoir <br />leakage return flows are estimated from data obtained trom the <br />Dille study.' Diversions from the river in the Kersey-Julesburg <br />reach were extracted from BureaU of Reclamation compilations <br />through the courtesy of their Region 7. 10 Estimates of the <br />monthly water requirement of crops was obtained from the American <br />Sooiety of Civil Engineers Paper Ho. 3331 Vol 127 1962 Part III <br />on ftMethod for Estimating Consumptive Use of Water for Agriculture- <br />by Wendell C. Munson F. ASCE.8 Return flows originating in <br />irrigations and precipitation and moving as ground water back to <br />the stream were estimated as the difference between the sum of <br />precipitation and the amounts diverted trom the river and the <br />sum of the estimated reservoir leakage and the estimated con- <br />G <br />sumptive use baeed upon Dille's area of 235 000 ,ao~es under <br />1~1&.tioD ~, the two D~stricts. <br /> <br />~'"., ~:l!~:~:81F~~t~~y!t:!~~:f:~~~t:~~~~1~~:~~o~~;'inue~ <br /> <br />the water prism ot the streamo It represents water held in <br />temporary storage. It passed the upper station but is retained <br />between the upper and lower ,gaging stations. When the flow of <br />the stream diminishes this temporarily stored water contributes <br />to the flow past the lower station. It is estimated on the <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />":1 <br /> <br />1 <br />