|
<br />
<br />'~- ~.:i.~,.:,;,-;- -.~~;I:!i~<':"'-~.---'-<"'~~'h'--_"';7_~'$1.~~:Ytl"'''.'''':-'';'-,~~~/
<br />
<br />"':
<br />
<br />,"..c_ ~.,~~~~1'."-.
<br />
<br />t'-( ()~ 1 "9
<br />\.; '-.) f- tJ .l ,
<br />
<br /> TABLE 3 - canal Lining Relocation and Pipeline Needs (Study I_ 3); and canal Structure Needing Repair or Repla~t (Study I_ 4)
<br /> S'IUDY ITEM 3 sruIJ'{ ITEM 4
<br /> Structure
<br /> Index Irrigation Brush and Tree Structure ReplaceIrent
<br /> No. canal Relocation Needs Ra1DVal Needs Lining Needs Pipeline Needs TarAL Repair Needs Needs IDrAL
<br /> Miles D:>llaxs (cfs) Miles ~ Miles Ibllars (cfs) Miles lX>llars ~ No. Dollars No. D:>llars Dollars
<br /> Water District 20 - -
<br /> 1 Atencio Ditch 0.10 100 100 2 300 300
<br /> 2 John Anderson 0.25 500 3.2 500 4 750 750
<br /> Ditch
<br /> 3 Star Ditch CO. 1.50 975 975 6 1,660 1,660
<br /> 4 Homer Ydren 13 5,290 5,290
<br /> 5 Anderson Di tdl 0.50 1,000 12.7 0.50 250 1,250 2 400 3 3,000 3,400
<br />.. Co.
<br />..
<br /> 7 Rio Grande 4.0 80,000 53 80,000 6 4,125 4,125
<br /> & San Luis
<br /> B Rio Grande & 1. 75 27,720 27,720 10 3,415 3,415
<br /> Lariat Ditch Co.
<br /> 9 Consolidated 0.50 500 250 0.25 500 1,000
<br /> Ditdl
<br /> 10 CbnnDnwea1th 3.00 1,500 20.0 120,000 512 121,500 11 1,200 18 58,000 59,200
<br /> Irr. Co.
<br /> n San Luis Valley 15.0 750,000 750 750,000 2 200 88 78,500 78,'100
<br /> Irr. Dist.
<br /> 12 Silva Ditch 1.0 1,000 1,000 2 1,500 1,500
<br /> 13 Little Danube 4.1 108,240 16.2 108,240 23 2,510 2,510
<br /> 14 Eh.rcMi tz Ditch 4 540 540
<br /> 15 Little Anna 2.55 40,392 10.5 40,392 39 1,950 1,950
<br /> 16 Hubbard ni tch 0.75 14,850 1.0 14,850 2 185 185
<br /> 17 Billings Ditch 1.00 400 34.94 400 1 1,000 1 2,000 3,000
<br />
<br />- ~ ",
<br />
<br />
|