Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Priel of Fuel Oil Mills per Kw-hr. i,iills per KW~hI'~ <br />- bbl. <br />'e <br />Pros t team Plant Eft. <br /> -<<' .90 .787 .511 <br /> .95 .863 .588 <br /> 1.00 .94:1 .665 <br /> 1.10 1.095 .819 <br />Futu e Steam Plant Eft. <br />.' W .1., .971 .695 <br /> 1.20 1.112 .838 <br /> ,--ii:. B. Roberts <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />0' <br />("j <br />,.... <br />.t:.. <br />,..... <br />...... <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />3., <br /> <br />'- <br />:f' <br />f <br />~ <br />f <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br />~ <br />j, <br />" <br /> <br />. <br />soroewh t different than that usually encountered in private <br />,I. .. , . <br /> <br />utilit practice. <br /> <br />,1 <br /> <br />Swum <br /> <br /> <br />f <br /> <br /> <br />.{ , <br /> <br />with <br /> <br />); <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />oblig tion of the cities of Los Angele~ Pasadena, ~lendale <br />and B rbank over the two existing 276,000 volt transmission <br />circu ts with what I regard as suitable steam peaking and <br />stand y for delivering energy to an exacting metropolitan <br />syste at an nverage annual load factor of 55% withraason- <br />able eliability. From this study I obtained the follOWing <br />value of falling water for primary energy at Boulder Dam~ <br />the d tails of Which are shown in Section I ot this report. 1 <br /> <br /> <br />CODlpetitive Value of Fnlling Water' <br />, For Primary Energy <br />Mills per Kw_hr. at BqulderDim <br />Based. on Base'd. on " <br />Fixed Charges pOl' Fixed Charge~ <br />Bureau of If Privately <br />Power and Light O\~ed <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />j <br />j <br /> <br />. <br />1 <br /> <br />j <br />.! <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />, .~..,' <br /> <br />