Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />. <br />tl,) <br />~ <br /> <br />~~~ <br />',,' <br /> <br />I <br />j <br />\ 29. <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />eqUi~ment at the steam plant, two mileY of back transmis~ <br />s10n\ to the nearest receiving station and step down equip- <br />ment at the receiving station. There is a pOint of diff~ <br />eren e between Mr. Sands and myself regarding the amount Of <br />back transmission required. The inolusion of additional <br />back transmission from the receiving station to the terminal <br />reoei ing station of the Boulder transmission line as.in- <br />clude in Mr. Sands' report cannot be justified. If so, <br />it wo ld be just as logical to assume that additional costs <br />Shoul. be added to the Boulder Transmission corrt to de- <br />liver Boulder power at the steam plant site, and possibly <br />ogical, since Boulder power is oompeting with steam <br />There are only two possible assumptions which can <br /> <br /> <br /> more <br />. power. <br />be Jus <br /> water <br /> ooste <br /> Trans.ll1 <br /> used, <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ified in the determination of the value of falling <br />or primary energy; either additional transmission <br />uat be added to both steam plant and the Boulder <br />ssion Line to deliver the power where it is actually <br />hich will be very difficult if not impossible to <br />calcul te, or, the method used by the Bureau should be <br />adopte , namely, that power delivered to any receiving sta- <br />tion on its l32,OOO volt belt system, which ultimately w1ll <br />encircl the city oonneoting all souroes of power, is the <br />deli ver point for any source of pO;7er. <br /> <br />water <br /> <br />I <br />fO~ <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />I <br /> <br />'! <br /> <br />., <br />., <br /> <br />"j <br /> <br />J <br />"J, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />A. B. Roberts <br /> <br />c' <br />i <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />