Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />t:::l <br />."".') <br />'''''' <br />~ <br />h;i <br />Q <br /> <br />{ <br /> <br />The reported data for the Port Washington p10nt <br />ne r Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in 1937, was as follows: <br /> <br />I <br />.. <br />" <br />120' <br />! <br />.,1 <br />" <br />'1 <br />. ~: . <br />',) <br /> <br /> <br /> Gauge lew-hr. <br /> Pl"essure StQam Temp. B.t.u.. Mills <br /> Lbs. Per .at Thr,ottle per pOl' PEl,r ti:w-hr. <br />'Ye r Sq. Iil. -12ell;. F. XVI-hr. -1?h:k- :.J~2Q.:..Q i 1 <br /> ~- <br />19 1320 525 10,535 550 l.55 <br /> <br />The tentative dosigns for the proposed. Harbor <br />Ste I Plant in Los Angelos are based upon the follOwing: <br /> <br />1350. <br /> <br />555 <br /> <br />1.54 <br /> <br />10,750 <br /> <br />950 <br /> <br />Inv tmeuLQ2ili. <br />The Bureau of Reclamation, under date of May 7, 1935, <br />stat d that the estimated cost of the four units with ap~ <br />purt nances now installed and being operated by the Bure~u <br />of P werand Light at the Boulder Dan Power Plant is <br />, <br /> <br />$913 ,000, exclusive of common facilities, and that the <br />estim lted cost of the common faclli ties for the initial in- <br />stall Uon is $2,500,000. I have assumed that common facili.. <br />ties 111 r9a.ch ~3,OOO,QOO when sixteen units have been in:'" <br />stall d. These figures give a unit cost of $25.30 per. kil~~ <br />Vlatt rated capaCity tor units and appurtenances, plUS <br />$2.30 er k11owattof rated capacity for common faCilities, <br />making a total of ~30.60 investment cost porkilowatt of <br />rated apa.eity installed at Boulder Power Plant. In these <br />estima es I have taken the two half-size units as being the <br /> <br />A. B. Roberts <br /> <br />-- <br />