Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(Ij <br />~ <br />00 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Colorado River Squawfish, Humpback Chub, or Humpback Sucker found in the Colorado, <br /> <br />Yampa and Green Rivers. There were no findings of adverse impact. To date, none <br /> <br />of the species ha ve been found in the L ittl e Snake Ri ver. Moreover, the project woul d <br />have only insignificant effect on river temperature, turbidity, and flow pattern <br />beyond the Little Snake. No data was submitted by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br /> <br />as a basis for altering that judgment. <br />Wildlife impacts and mitigation adequacy was a principal topic of concern and <br /> <br />controversy. Subsequent to receipt of the draft statement, considerable discussion <br /> <br />took place concerning the necessity and adequacy of proposed wildlife mitigation <br /> <br />measures. <br /> <br />I am pleased that the Bureau of Reel ama ti on has accepted recommendations <br /> <br />developed by the Colorado Division of Wildlife for important modifications. As a <br />. consequence, I be 1 i eve that the anti ci pated adverse wil dl ife i mpactswi 11 be reduced. <br /> <br />Three wildlife concerns come to light. First, the project's impact on fishing. <br /> <br />Although approximately 4 - 5 miles below and above the Pot Hook Dam site would be lost <br />as a stream fishery, our analysis showed overall fishing opportunity to be enhanced <br /> <br />by creation of a deep, large pool at the reservoir, with high water quality, and <br /> <br />provision for some 15 miles of fishing access upstream of the reservoir. As a result, <br /> <br />the reliability and range of fishing opportunities would be increased, <br /> <br /> <br />A second wildlife concern focused on loss of habitat for elk and deer in the <br /> <br />vicinity of the reservoir site. Colorado recommended purchase and management of <br /> <br />. <br />1 <br />~ <br /> <br />sufficient range of comparable value in Moffat or Routt Counties at a cost not to <br /> <br />exceed $300,000. , I n our vi ew, th i s more than compensa ted any losses to deer and elk. <br />The third dimension is the most controversial and is based upon the relationship of <br />the project area to an important 'segment of Colorado's sage grouse and antelope popu- <br />lations. Conversion of sage habitat to irrigated crops could have a very serious effect. <br /> <br />'.' <br /> <br />:. <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />f <br />Ii <br /> <br />The total anticipated habitat loss will be approximately 16,000 acres. Some of this <br />land is critical winter range for both antelope and sage grouse. The Department of <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />~:I <br />'" <br />