Laserfiche WebLink
<br />and future needs in the lower basin. The ten to the upper basin <br /> <br />only inoludes a future use above. I like to be modorate in my <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />statement, but I think that is certainly an unfair proposition, <br /> <br />nnd feeling th~t way ~bout it at this timo I cortainly must ro- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ject it. <br /> <br />Lill. llOGV.c:n. Judge Davis' estimate of your ultimate needs are <br /> <br />five million seven hundrod thousand. <br /> <br />im. nORVI]L, And the upper needs cHe six million one <br /> <br />hundred o.nd fifty theusc:md, making a difference of four hU:1dred <br /> <br />and fifty thousand aere foet. <br /> <br />l:illo C.ARP~~jlTTEIL Tho surplus of YJ"hich v~'ould como down to YOUo <br /> <br />1:1R 0 fj 0 B.. DJ~VIS:. And anything in OYCODS of th~ t you \vould <br /> <br />get. <br /> <br />HR. liOnVI:iJL; I think, !.ir. Chairman, if that is the attitude <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />that must eontinually be assumed by the upper division we would <br /> <br />better tryout some other proposition, because' it would be utterly <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />useless to take this propooition back to our st'ato 2.nd expoct to <br /> <br />have it ratified by the legislature. I don't like to stultify my- <br /> <br />solf and put myself in a position where wo Qccopt ono-third of the <br /> <br />wator, when two thirds of it is kept above for futuro use, ex- <br /> <br />eluding presont use of wator. <br /> <br />1ill. CAnp~HTZH:; Er. Harviol, I foar you arc losing sight of <br /> <br />anothor fc~turo in this propositiollu ~o anticipate you will msko <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />much lare-er encroachments upon the river than you are now making, <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />by reason of greater use,of the water of the mccin river in the <br /> <br />lower territory and all of that should bo added to this Loo's <br /> <br />96 <br /> <br />17th-S.F. <br />8 <br /> <br />, ",- <br />