My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08974
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08974
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:50:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:23:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations and Entities - Colorado River Basin States Forum California
State
CA
Basin
Western Slope
Date
1/1/1974
Author
Myron B Holburt
Title
Annual Report for the Calendar Year 1973
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />C' r-: f:' .~- <br />j. .. ~ -' <br /> <br />waters from the proposed desalting <br />plant with fresh water, <br />3), Installation and operation. at <br />Federal expense. of wells necessary <br />to protect against loss of ground <br />water to Mexico and maintenance <br />of deliveries at San Luis at the <br />Southerly International Boundary, <br />4), Delineation of the new power <br />source to provide power for the <br />desalting plant and the well field, <br />5), Authorization of a Colorado <br />River Basin Salinity Control <br />program, <br />During the negotiations leading <br />to Minute 242. Mexico was <br />informed by the United States' <br />negotiators that the U, S, intends <br />to undertake a program to control <br />the salinity at Imperial Dam, It is <br />clear from statements made by <br />Ambassador Herbert Brownell and <br />Minister of Foreign Affairs Emilio <br />Rabasa, the principal negotiators <br />for the two countries. that unless <br />the salinity at Imperial Dam is <br />maintained near present levels. we <br />will have a new salinity problem <br />with Mexico, <br /> <br />Salinity Control Legislation <br /> <br />The Colorado River Board was <br />active in preparing salinity control <br />legislation, Early in 1973. the Chief <br />Engineer met with representatives <br />of the Basin states to further refine <br />the legislation that was hurriedly <br />introduced at the end of '972, <br />During the next few months. he <br />worked with interested California <br />agencies. as well as the other Basin <br />states. through the Committee of <br />Fourteen. in developing legislation <br />that was agreed upon by <br />representatives from the seven <br />Colorado River Basin states, <br />On May 14. legislation <br />authorizing a Colorado River <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />salinity control program was <br />introduced into Congress as H,R. <br />7774, H,R, 7775. and S, 1807. "The <br />Colorado River Salinity Control Act <br />of 1973", The two House bills were <br />co-sponsored by 35 Colorado River <br />Basin State Congressmen and S, <br />1807 was co-sponsored by all 14 <br />Basin State Senators, <br />These identical bills would <br />authorize the construction of three <br />salinity control units as the initial <br />stage of the salinity control <br />program, They are LaVerkin <br />Springs in Utah and Paradox Valley <br />and Grand Valley in Colorado, The <br />bills would also expedite planning <br />reports on 13 other salinity control <br />units, The three projects authorized <br />for construction would prevent <br />approximately 500,000 tons per year <br />from entering the Colorado River, <br />The bills also allocated costs of the <br />projects; 75% to be <br />nonreimbursable Federal <br />expenditure and 25% to be <br />allocated to the Basin states, The <br />States' share would be allocated <br />85% to the Lower Basin states and <br />15% to the Upper Basin states. <br />with funds coming from the Upper <br />and Lower Basin Development <br />Funds, <br />The Board's staft' conducted <br />intensive studies of costs. <br />financing. and benefits in <br />preparation for hearings on the <br />bills, Because of the agreement <br />signed with Mexico. however. the <br />hearings were postponed until after <br />the end of the calendar year. when <br />they were combined with hearings <br />on the Mexican agreement. <br />Near the end of the year. the <br />Board. together with the other <br />basin states. began work on <br />comprehensive legislation that <br />would combine both the <br />Administration's and the States' list <br />of measures to implement Minute <br />No, 242 with the 1973 basinwide <br />salinity control legislation, <br /> <br /> r-----_ <br /> I - - -'--- <br /> , <br /> I <br /> , <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I N E V <br />, 11 <br />I <br />"\ . Carson City <br /> '" <br /> , <br /> '" <br /> '" <br /> , <br /> \ <br /> \ <br /> , <br /> '" <br /> <br />o <br />"1~ <br />/.;0 <br />o <br /> <br />Los Angeles <br />~, <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado River Basin Salinity <br />Control Program <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation is <br />continuing at an accelerated pace <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.