Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5.1 Phase 2 Scope of Work NO.1 <br /> <br />The Phase 2 Scope of Work NO.1 tasks are attached as Table 1. Figure 1 is a scope of <br />work task flow chart. The anticipated cost for the work is $30,000. The five Phase 2 tasks for <br />this scope include: <br /> <br />Task Number <br /> <br />1. Literature Review - Aquifer Layering Effects on Well Production <br />2. Radial-Flow Correction Analysis <br />3. Denver Basin Aquifer-Layered Radial Flow Production Analysis <br />4. Economic Analysis <br />5. Report <br /> <br />In this Phase 2 work, the results from two production-drawdown analyses will be <br />compared to determine the most accurate method to determine drawdown at a Denver Basin <br />aquifer well. Results of a radial-flow correction to estimate groundwater level in a well based on <br />groundwater level in a model cell performed on output from Banta's model, Task 2 above, will be <br />compared to drawdown results from a layered-radial flow numerical model, Task 3 above. The <br />comparison will be performed on wells from the same location in response to identical pumping <br />stresses. If the pumping stresses at the selected model cells are considered unreasonable, <br />additional simulations will be performed with more appropriate well production rates. The <br />pumping water levels from these simulations would then be used as input to the economic <br />analyses. <br /> <br />It is expected that the layered radial flow model will produce the more accurate results <br />when compared to the radial flow correction analysis. However, if the radial flow correction <br />analysis can produce results comparable to the layered analysis, the study will benefit from an <br />analysis of more aquifers and well locations. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />HRS WATER CONSULTANTS, INC <br />