Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0007 <br /> <br />Alternatives Considered in Detail <br />No Action Alternative <br />This alternative reflects the present .level of water sales from the <br /> <br />;1,/' {", i" <br />, A~. r J / <br /> <br />reservoir and the present reservoir. operational practices. Reservoir releases <br /> <br /> <br />are made to meet senior water rights demands downstream of Ruedi Reservoir or <br /> <br /> <br />to compensate downstream water users for out-of-priority diversion by the <br /> <br /> <br />collection system of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project. Fall, winter al).d early <br /> <br /> <br />spring releases are made from the reservoir to: provide adequate storage for <br /> <br /> <br />spring runoff. <br /> <br />The first-round water sales of 7,850 acre-feet included 1,850 aore-feet <br /> <br /> <br />of augmented water sales for munioipal and.domestio uses and 6,000 aore-feet <br /> <br /> <br />of augmented water sales for industrial use, and represents the maximum amount <br /> <br /> <br />of water whioh would be sold from Ruedi Reservoir during an extremely dry <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />year. <br /> <br />Preferred Alternative. Maximum Augmentation Sales, with No Sales from <br />a 28,000 AF Replacement Pool, Assuming a 20%/80% Munioipal/Industrial <br />Demand Split, Respectively <br /> <br />The preferred Alternative represents a modifioation of the maximum <br /> <br />unoonstrained yield of the reservoir oapaoity (~lternative 2), This modifioa- <br />f_ -, , <br /> <br />tion was a result of"publi6 oomment and oonsul~ation during the assessment <br /> <br /> <br />review process. Water sales would be restrioted to the available water supplY <br /> <br /> <br />provided by Ruedi Reservoir with 28,000 aore-feet'being available annually for <br /> <br />replaoement purposes. This oonforms with the ihtent of the projeot authoriza- <br /> <br /> <br />tion to provide up to 28,000 aore-feet of capaoity in Ruedi Reservoir .equ'iva- <br /> <br /> <br />lent to that whioh would have been provided by the proposed Aspen Reservoir <br /> <br /> <br />for replaoement and other purposes. Water sales would not be made from the <br /> <br />replaoement pool until additional operating experienoe is gained. This alter- <br /> <br /> <br />native will yield a marketable water supply of up to 58,000 aore-feet under a <br /> <br /> <br />dry-year condition' depending on the demand pattern reflecting shortages of up <br /> <br /> <br />to 15 percent and 30 peroent, respectively, for ,industrial and municipal and <br /> <br /> <br />domestic uses. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br /> <br />The various environmental effeots of the different alternatives are due <br /> <br /> <br />to differenoes in the amount of water sold from:Ruedi, and the differences in <br /> <br /> <br />the timing of the release of water from the reservoir. In an average year, No <br /> <br />v <br />