Laserfiche WebLink
<br />{ '.' - <br />. ,I _". <br />. i-.:"; -"t <br />... .--... <br /> <br />REVISED DRAFT (# I 0) - August II. 2004 <br />Clean Version <br /> <br />and federal agencies involved in the Glen Canyon Dam AMP. All aspects of the AMP <br />are included in this plan, including but not limited to the Programmatic Agreement on <br />Cultural Resources (PA) and programs for compliance with the Endangered Species Act <br />(ESA). <br /> <br />Meetings oftbe AMWG and TWG may serve to facilitate government-to- <br />government consultation between federal agencies and tribal governments, but <br />participation in such meetings by federal agency and tribal representatives does not <br />necessarily mean that government-to-government consultation has been adequate or <br />sufficient. To the extent that consultation does occur in the context of AMWG and/or <br />TWG meetings, it can be, and in many instances should be, supplemented by additional <br />meetings between federal and tribal representatives. Consultations between federal <br />agency officials and tribal officials (or their designated employees with authority to act on <br />their behalf) are not subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) where such <br />meetings are for the purpose of "exchanging views, information. or advice relating to the <br />management or implementation of Federal programs." Unfunded Mandates Reform Act <br />of 1995, 2 U.S.C. g1534. <br /> <br />In addition to the tribes that participate in the AMWG and TWG, the Havasupai <br />Tribe and San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe also have interests that may be affected by <br />activities carried out under the auspices of the AMP and/or PA. The fact that these two <br />tribes choose not to participate in the AMWG and TWG does not relieve federal agencies <br />of their obligations to engage in consultation with these tribes. <br /> <br />C. Relationsbip oftbis Consultation Plan to tbe Programmatic Agreement <br />and Historic Preservation Plan <br /> <br />The P A stipulates the development of a Historic Preservation Plan (HPP) for the <br />long-term management of the Grand Canyon River Corridor District and any other <br />historic properties within the area of potential effects of the Glen Canyon Dam <br />operations. The HPP is currently being developed. This Tribal Consultation Plan is <br />being developed with the intent of incorporating it as a chapter in the HPP. <br /> <br />The PAis currently being revised to reflect certain developments since it was <br />executed, including Amendments to the NHP A enacted in 1992 and revisions to the <br />ACHP regulations promulgated in December 2000. Pursuant to the 1992 amendments to <br />the NHPA, both the Hualapai Tribe and Navajo Nation have assumed the role in the <br />section 106 process that would otherwise be performed by the AZ SHPO - each has a <br />Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO), and this must be reflected in the revised P A. <br />In addition, the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) and the Bureau of Indian <br />Affairs (BIA) will become signatories, the Colorado River Energy Distributors <br />Association (CREDA) has become a signatory, and additional signatories may also be <br />added. <br /> <br />6 <br />