Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PROPOSED CRITICAL HABITAT <br />SHORELINE OWNERSHIPS BY STATE AND RIVER <br /> <br /> SUTE RIVER NPS BLM PRIVATE TRIBAL LANDS FIlS FS STATE <br /> GREEN 139 340 80 63 22 10 <br /> COLOllADO 260 123 104 4 <br /> UTAH DUSCHENE 0.6 4 <br /> ~HITE 43 29 25 13 <br /> SAN JUAN 43 62 3 120 <br /> GREEN 8 <br /> COLORADO 52 150 4 <br /> COLORADO YAMPA 78 52 123 12 <br /> GUNN I SON 47 65 8 <br /> ~H1TE 8 110 <br /> SAN JUAN 6 <br />I NE~ MEXICO I SAN JUAN I I I 19 I 99 I I I I <br /> GILA 53 132 74 5 <br /> SALT 32 76' <br /> ARIZONA VERDE 86 210 , <br /> LITTLE CO. 3 13 <br /> R. <br /> COLORADO 441 109 <br />I AZICA I COLORADO I I 24 I 81 I 145 I 102 I I 40 I <br />I AZ/NV I COLORADO I 220 I I 33 I 7 I I I I <br /> <br />1 The river distances shown in this tabLe were compiled using total shoreline miles <br />(Bssuning 1 mHe of river centerline has 2 mHes of shoreline) for each proposed critical <br />habitst reach. There is considerable overl,p of proposed critical habitat reaches between <br />speciesj thus, totat miles of critical habit8t for all four Colorado River endangered <br />fishes proposed to be designated cannot be obtained from this table. <br />2 ~PS.-N8tional Park Service; BLM..Bureeu oi Land Management; fS.-U.5. Forest Service; F~S. <br />-u.S. Fish and ~ildlife Service. <br />