Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. .,\ <br />..J <br />~ <br />tt.:-..... <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The medium level of development without any EET's by the year <br />2000 was designated by the CIFSG as M2WD;when instream flow <br />"- <br />depletions under M2WO were augmented by diversions for the <br />Sect ion 13(a) Basel i ne or the Accelerated Synfuel scenarios, <br />the conditions were designated by M2WB or M2WA, respectively. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Stream Reaches as Related to MWO Analysis <br /> <br />The stream reaches studied under present conditions for <br />fisheries were also analyzed for future depletion impacts, with <br />the following exceptions or variations: <br /> <br />l' <br /> <br />No analysis of impacts on fisheries or recreation was made <br /> <br /> <br />for the San Juan River in the vicinity of Archuleta, New <br /> <br /> <br />Mexico since hydrologic projections indicated no signifi- <br /> <br />cant change in flow. <br /> <br />2' Analysis of impacts on the White River in the reach from <br />the North Fork/South Fork confluence was made on the basis <br />of two possibilities for providing water to developing <br />EET's. These, taken in conjunction with the two levels of <br />EET development, resulted in four "cases". as follows: <br /> <br />M2WB <br /> <br />Case 1: A reservoi r on the South Fork with a pipe- <br /> <br /> <br />line direct to the EET development area, and <br /> <br />62 <br />