Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />-.J <br />o <br />--.1 <br /> <br />F. Selection of Appropriate Recreational Activities.......... <br />G. Sources and Kinds of Hydrologic Data Used................. <br />1. Historic Flow Records - USGS.......................... <br />2. Gaging Station Data - USGS............................ <br />3. Sediment and Temperature Data......................... <br />4. Hydrologic Data (Discharges) Specific to the <br /> <br />Assessment. ... . . ... . ... . ., . .. . .. . . . .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. . .. . <br />a. Present Level of Depletions....................... <br />b. Projected Depletion Levels.. ................. ..... <br />l' Based on Alternative Levels of Develop- <br /> <br />ment............ ........... ................... <br />2' Based on Alternative Delivery Systems......... <br />c. Data Supplied by the BR and Production Automation, <br />Inc..... ............. ...... .. ......... . .... ....... <br />d. Data used by the CIFSG..... .. .,. .. . . . . . .. .. . .. . . .. <br />e. Other Di scharge Data Considered................... <br />l' Monthly Median Based on Daily Averages........ <br />2' Possible Value of Flow Frequency <br /> <br />Analysis................. ............ ......... <br />H. Stream Reach Simulation................................... <br />1. Hydraulic Simulation Techniques....................... <br />2. Use of WSP Model for Analysis of Instream Flowl <br />Fisheries and Recreation Relationships................ <br />a. Input Data for Model Calibration.................. <br />b. Calibration of Model for Observed Flow............ <br />c. Calibration for Range of Discharges Possible...... <br />d. Reconnaissance versus Site-specific Calibration <br /> <br />Procedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />I. Analysis of Fish Habitat Recreation Potential, and Water- <br />use Impacts............................................... <br />1. Determination of Maximum WUA.......................... <br />2. Present Conditions, WUA (1979 Level of Depletions) and <br />Qua 1 i ty Ratings....................................... <br />a. Attachment H...................................... <br />b. 1979 Levels of Flow Depletion.......... ........... <br />c. Tab 1 e (X)......................................... <br />d. Table (Y)......................................... <br />e. Tables (X') and (Y').............................. <br />f. Revi ew Procedure.................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />g. Find i ngs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />3. Potential Future Instream Flow Uses................... <br />4. Future Conditions, WUA (Year 2000 Levels of Depletion) <br />and Qua 1 ity Rat i ngs.. . . . . . .. . . .. .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . <br />a. Transmittal of Impact Analysis.... ........... ..... <br />b. Levels of Development and Depletion............... <br />c. Stream Reaches as Related to MWO Analysis... ...... <br />d. Magnitude of M2WB and MiWA Depletion of MiWO Flows. <br />e. White River Depletions............................ <br />f. Recapitulation of Findings........................ <br />l' Imp rovements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />a I Fi sheries.. . ... .. .. . ... . . . . .. ., . . . .. .. . . .. <br />b' Recreation................................ <br /> <br /> <br />ii <br />