Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />r\) <br />.... <br /><0 <br />c.;-, <br /> <br />Shale ~ember of the Green River Formatioa, and alluvial aquifers. <br />Water quality is generally very good. Formatioas in the Rock Springs <br />uplift yield variable quantities of water but the water is moderately <br />saline, generally exceeding 7,000 ppm of TDS, which limits the use- <br />fulne,s of wells tapped in this region (Welder and McGree\?, 1966). <br />Recharge rates into the Washakie Basin are low since most precipi- <br />tation falling in the basin leaves the area by surface drainage at <br />by evaporation, but total reserves are adequate because past exploi- <br />tation has been small. Because of the profuse yields of most of <br />the major aquifers discussed above, mine "der..ratering" could prove <br />to be a problem for oil shale operations (Welder, 1968). As eco- <br />nomic development inc~e2ses the use of ground water in the Upper <br />Green River Basin, leakage from higher salinity aquifers (especi- <br />ally from the Green F~ver Fo~tion) towards the lower salinity aqui- <br />fers may.result in gradual grou~d water degradation (Lowham et al., <br />1976). <br /> <br />GREAT DIVIDE BASIN (WAU 140402) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ground water recharge rates in the Great Divide Basin (Fig. D.3) <br />are low, but since the region is one of interior drainage and since <br />aquifers have been sparsely tapped by wells, water reserves are <br />believed to be relatively extensive. The specific amount of these <br />reserves is u~k~own, however (~elder and McGreevy, 1966). Most of <br />the gro~d water discharge in the Great Divide Basin is through <br />evaporation. <br /> <br />TWo major aquifers occupy the Great Divide Basin. The Wasatch <br />Formation covers the western and central part, while the Battle Spring <br />Formation covers the eastern and northeastern part of the basin. <br />Water is generally under artesian pressure. The Wasatch Formation <br />produces relatively high yields of water; most wells from the Wasatch <br />Formation produce from 5 to 110 gpm at less than 1,000 feet depth; <br />however, one well at Wamsutter, Wyoming, is reported to produce <br />250 gp~. Yields as high as 500 gpm may be possible from wells deeper <br />than 1,000 reet in the thicker sequences of the sandstone formation. <br />Dissolved solids in the Wasatch Formation range from 500 to 2,800 ppm <br />(Welder and ~!cGreev"'l. 1966). Yields from the Battle Spring Formation <br />are potentially greater than from the Wasatch Formation. It is possible <br />that a favorably placed well could produce up to 1,000 gpm. One 504 <br />foot well produces 300 gp~. Dissolved solids range from about 1,000 <br />ppm in the southeast portion of the Great Divide Basin to as low as <br />200 ppm in the northeast. <br /> <br />Two other aquifers, the Fort Union and Lance formations on the <br />western boundary of the Great Divide Basin, are e~~ected to produce <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />D-8 <br />