Laserfiche WebLink
<br />be critical in reducing volatilization and moisture and, consequently, <br />increasing the rank of coal. ~~ong these are (1) depth of burial with <br />associated pressure and heat, (2) time, (3) structural defomation <br />(usually through metamorphism), (4) possible heat of nearby intrusive <br />igneous rocks, and (5) type of plants decomposing into the coal. <br /> <br />N <br />""" <br />~ <br />W <br /> <br />In the coal picture for the entire United States, western coals <br />are far younger in depositional age thun are the eastern coals, and <br />they tend to be covered by less overburden. Thus, most western coal <br />is lower in rank--subbituminous up through the lower levels of the <br />bituminous ranks. There is one known important anthracite deposit in <br />the Upper Colorado River Region in Gunnison County, Colorado. Much <br />western coal, particularly in Wyoming, is neither deeply buried by <br />overburden, nor has it been subjected to complex folding, faulting, <br />heat, and pressure of metamorphism, which would have lowered the <br />moisture content and increesed the rank. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Grade of coal is a quality deternination based on content of ash, <br />sulfur, and other constituent materials and is a basis for evaluating <br />the various coals. Most coals currently mined and included in total <br />resource estimates contain less than 33 percent ash, by weight. The <br />average ash content from a study of several ~ine samples from the encire <br />United States was 8.9 percent, which is higher than the average ash <br />content of most western coals (Averitt, 1975). In the Averitt study, <br />sulfur content averaged 1.9 percent, much higher than the sulfur in <br />the majority of western coals, which makes the Upper Colorado River <br />Region coals more desirable from the standpoint of air pollution <br />control and reduction. <br /> <br />The economic recoverability of coal, and estimates of the total <br />available resource, depends on the thic~ess of coal beds. For higher <br />rank, higher value eoals, beds as thin as 14 inches may be considered <br />economically feasible for mining. For lower ranks of coal, such as <br />subbituminous and lignite, beds are considered minable if they are fro~ <br />2~ to 10 feet thick. (Averitt, 1975). Thickness of overburden is also <br />a factor in the recoverability of coal and in determining the method of <br />mining used (e.g., whether or not strip mining is feasible). Coal <br />resource data are usually categorized by the thickness of overburden. <br />Deposits to an overburden depth of 0 to 3,000 feet are classified as <br />a surface deposit, and in the upper layers to about 1,500 feet are <br />eonsidered minable by surface methods, while overburden thickness <br />between 3,000 and 6,000 requires underground mining. <br /> <br />ESTIMATING THE RESOURCE <br /> <br />The coal resource, which represents the total quantity of coal in <br />the ground including identified and hypothetical resources, is often <br />difficult to identify. In estimating the coal resource, the terms <br />"measured, II uindicated, II dnd "inferred" are used. The Cerm "reserve" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />B-3 <br />