Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />00 <br />C) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />GEOLOGICAL SETTI,G ~~ DEPOSITIO~AL HISTORY <br /> <br />The vast Uinta-Piceance Basin, divided by the Douglas Creek arch, <br />~as the depositional area for oil shale. It is bou~ded on the west <br />in Utah by the Wasatch Plateau, on the no~th by the Uinta. Mountains, <br />and on the east by the Elk Mountains and White Rive~ uplift in Colo~ado. <br />The southe~n limit is not as clearly deEined and the more gentle slopes <br />of this boundary only vaguely indicate the edges of ancient Lake Uinta. <br />Generally, the Book Cliffs, the La Sal ~!Ounteins end the Uncompahgre <br />uplift comprise the southe~n edge of this basin. <br /> <br />While most oil reserves of the wo~ld we~e deposited unde~ marine <br />conditions, deposition of the Green River oil shales occurred in a <br />lacustrine (lake) environment. It is the quiescent lake situation <br />which created the flexible, very thinly laminated deposits. The special <br />thermal and chemical characteristics of the lakes in which the Green <br />River Formation (Lake Uinta in Colorado and Utah, Lake Gosiute in <br />Wyoming, and a third, unnamed lake in Wyoming's Fossil syncline) was <br />formed, allowed the deposition of thin-bedded oil shales and a numbe~ <br />of relatively rare carbonate ~inerals, which occur throughout the <br />formation (Weichnan, 1973). <br /> <br />The three ancient lakes in which the G~een River Formation was <br />deposited were stable, two-layer lakes which did not overturn annually <br />as most lakes do, probably due to their great depth (Fig. C.J). Lack <br />of circulation and the~al stability led to concentt~tion of the car- <br />bonate minerals, particularly nahcolite. Lack or annual turnover caused <br />the water in the bottom layer to become a strop.~ basic sodium carbonate <br />solution (Oil and Gas Journal, 1964) charged with HZS, RC03, and C03 <br />(Weichman, 1973). Water in the top layer re~ained relatively fresh, <br />and organic matter--mainly blue-green algae--thrived. The anaerobic <br />bacteria that thrived in the lower zone helped process organic material <br />from above into a uniform gel that was deposited in even layers. The <br />basic nature of the lake helped preserve the hydrogen in the organic <br />layers (Oil and Gas Journal, 1964). The depoce~ter for the organic <br />material, at the deepest part of the lake, ~as the Piceance Creek <br />Basin where the largest oil shale resources are fou~d. <br /> <br />Various changes occurring in the lakes altered the emphasis on <br />deposition of the organic materials. Possibly the lakQs began a <br />regression period, or evaporation substantially increased over inflow. <br />Salinity increased and deposition of organicsdec~eased) leaving layers <br />of kerogen-lean material that contained large ~ounts of precipitated <br />che~ical salts ia nodules Dr beds (Weic~an, 19i3). <br /> <br />The chemistry of oil shale and associated depositional minerals <br />is extremely.coffiplex, as can be seen in Table C.2 (authigenic minerals). <br />Only the most important of these minerals will be discussed here. In <br />Colorado, nahcolite, a sodil~ bicarbonate material, is abundant. The <br />nahcolite could be used as a source of soca ash or it could find a <br /> <br />C-6 <br />