Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />expected results of installing and operating a SWS on Glen Canyon Dam. This <br />effort will require a specific source of construction funds. Funding will be <br />requested as a separate appropriation through the Federal budget process under <br />Section 8 of the Colorado River Storage Project Act. <br /> <br />A Draft Plan of Study on the SWS has been produced by Reclamation and contains <br />a potential schedule for investigations and implementation. This report has <br />been provided to the Service and other interested parties. The schedule <br />represents an acceleration of Reclamation's planning and construction process. <br />Implementation is contingent upon congressional appropriations to complete the <br />work. Work will most likely be conducted in 2 phases. Phase one will focus <br />on technical and planning activities and include scientific evaluation of the <br />potential effects and impacts of the SWS on the upstream and downstream <br />resources. If studies indicate implementation is feasible and funding is <br />approved, phase two, construction would consist of an initial effort focused <br />on installation and testing of structures. Additional evaluation under the <br />National Environmental Policy Act may also be required on the operation of the <br />SWS. <br /> <br />I.C. Studies of the Response of Native Fish to Various temperature regimes and <br />River flows. <br /> <br />Reclamation recognized the need to gather additional information on the <br />ecology of endangered fishes in Glen and Grand Canyons and will support <br />additional research determined to be necessary. Many of the studies <br />identified in the RPA are either on-going or included in the planning process. <br />However, studies will necessarily be limited to threatened and endangered <br />fish, with data on other native fish and non-native fish collected incident to <br />these studies. Studies of other resources is more appropriately addressed <br />through the long term monitoring program or research conducted under the <br />supervision of the research center. <br /> <br />2. Protect HBC spawning population and habitat in the Little Colorado River <br />by being instrumental in developing a management plan for this river. <br /> <br />Potential threats to HBC or their habitat in the vicinity of the LCR <br />identified by the Service are not related to dam operations. Reclamation does <br />not have the legal authority or jurisdiction to implement a plan to provide <br />protection against catastrophic or other events not related to dam operations. <br />We continue to believe development of a management plan for the Little <br />Colorado River (LCR) should be included in the opinion only as a conservation <br />recommendation as it does not meet the definition of a RPA. <br /> <br />In the spirit of recovery of the HBC, Reclamation has assisted the Navajo <br />Nation in gathering technical information necessary to initiate this effort. <br />This includes data which has been input to the Glen Canyon Environmental <br />Studies Geographic Information System and includes detailed maps of the lower <br />12 kilometers of the LCR, the critical habitat area, and large scale maps of <br />the rest of the LCR watershed. Reclamation is funding a one-year effort by <br />the Navajo Nation in Fiscal Year 1995 to develop the Management Plan forum. <br />We will continue to work cooperatively with those entities having authority <br />and jurisdiction to fund and implement the plan. <br />