My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08883
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08883
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:50:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:20:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.600.20
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - USDA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/1/1996
Title
Grand Valley Salinity Project 1995 Annual Monitoring and Evaluation Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />N TABLE .. <br />1":1 GRAND VALLEY SALINITY CONTROL PROJECT <br />~ AVERAGE IRRIGATION WATER MANAGEMENT DATA <br />O'J BY CROPS, 1985-1995 <br /> Crop Years Irrig. Inflow Outflow Infil. SMD D.P. Irrig. <br /> Monitored No. (in.) (in.) (in. ) (in.) (in.) Eff. (%) <br /> ALFALFA 11 8 64.0 17.1 46.9 30.1 16.8 48 <br /> CORN 11 7 52.3 17.1 35.3 19.4 15.9 38 <br /> SMALL GRAIN 10 6 55.5 16.3 39.2 15.4 23.8 32 <br /> ORCllARD 10 6 50.1 12.6 38.9 30.3 8.6 60 <br /> GRAPES 7 14 33.4 2.6 30.8 24.5 6.3 74 <br /> BEANS 6 10 48.0 11.8 36.2 17.0 19.2 36 <br /> SOYBEANS 3 8 89.9 28.3 61.6 23.8 37.8 26 <br /> <br />Infiltration Estimates: <br /> <br />'Application infiltration rates for each site were determined from <br />individual site summaries. The infiltrated depth was divided by the <br />number of hours per set to determine an application infiltration rate in <br />inches per hour. The average infiltration rates for the different soils <br />monitored on surface irrigation sites were determined and provided in <br />Figure 2. The infiltration.rates ranged from, 0.17 inches to 0.38 inches <br />per hour. <br /> <br />In the infiltration rate calculation, the wetted perimeter was not taken <br />into consideration and the data shown in Figure 2 is based on 100% <br />wetted acreage. Our field observations have shown that the wetted <br />perimeter on furrow irrigated fields is actually less than 50%. This <br />means that the application infiltration rates shown in Figure 2 could be <br />doubled for sites with every row irrigation to get an estimate ,of <br />average soil intake rate (a conservative estimate based upon having only <br />50% of the soil surface actually wetted). Alternate row irrigation is <br />also fairly common in the Valley. with this method, the wetted <br />perimeter may be assumed to be about 25%. In alternate row irrigation, <br />the application infiltration rates may be multiplied by a factor of four <br />in order to estimate soil intake rate. <br /> <br />Infiltration rate for the first irrigation is generally higher for <br />annual row crops, but not necessarily so for perennial crops. The <br />monitoring data indicates that for most soils, the infiltration rates <br />may be higher than previously thought. Irrigation M&E data from 1985 to <br />1989 also verifies this. Therefore, for salinity IWM planning purposes <br />"infiltration rate planning ranges" based on 1986 to 1990 M&E data have <br />been provided to the field office planners. These infiltration rate <br />ranges seem to provide a better estimate of projected deep percolation, <br />flow rate and irrigation efficiency. The planning infiltration ranges <br />and average infiltration rates from 1986 to 1990 are provided below. <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.