Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l',;l <br />r.,) <br />c.:J <br />1',) <br /> <br />CHART # 1 <br /> <br />SYSTEM COMPARISON <br />COMPARISON OF SYSTEMS WORkED WITH 95% OF ThE TIME <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />A'f8raCB O(1raditional s starns 19,.4 in, <br /> <br /> <br />13 15 <br />:I: <br />(,) <br />Z <br /> <br />.!i <br />on <br />Q <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />.!i <br /> <br />"1 <br />'" <br />~ <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />EDS CDS <br /> <br />PGP PGS <br />IRRIGATION SYSTEM <br /> <br />EDS = Eartl1 ditch to siphon tubes <br />CDS = Concrete ditch to siphon tubes <br />PGP = Pipe to gated pipe <br /> <br /> <br />I ~D,p.l <br /> <br />~ <br />'" <br />.; <br /> <br />5 <br />'" <br />.; <br /> <br />SRS MIS <br /> <br />PGS = Pipe to gated pipe, surge <br />SRS = Sideroll sprinkler <br />MIS = Microspray <br /> <br />Deep percolation values shown are averages of all sites for that type of system over <br />the eleven year period, without reguard to individual crops. <br /> <br />Earth and Concrete ditches with siphon tubes were averaged together for the ' <br />traditional system as these are the two major systems being improved; with <br />the priority going to the earthen ditch. <br /> <br />15 <br />