Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />II <br /> <br />Soil Conservation Service Estimates <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~.:3~er and salt budgets developed by the SCS for present conditions are pre- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />sented 1n Figure II-2. <br /> <br />Based on an inflow to the ground water system of <br /> <br />57,821 acre-feet from irrigation deep percolation and canal loss, and a salt <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />pickup i, the ground water system of t~e irrigation sector of 149,175 tons per <br /> <br />year, a sal t load ing factor was developed. <br /> <br />This factor indicates that based <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />on SCS data that for each acre-foot of water that can be prevented from <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />entering the ground water system in the agricultural area, 2.6 tons of salt <br /> <br />per year will be prevented from entering the Colorado River. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />This analysis was completed to compare budget estimates by the SCS and <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reclamation. <br /> <br />This comparison was based <br /> <br />on the deep percolation into the <br /> <br />ground water <br /> <br />system. <br /> <br />The salt loading <br /> <br />factor of 2.4 tons/acre-foot by <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reclamation agrees closely with the salt loading factor of 2.6 tons/acre-foot <br /> <br />developed by the SCS. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The SCS has based their salt reduction on differences in return flow; however, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />the SCS water budgets provide sufficient data to determine the changes in deep <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />percol at ion for various on- farm improvement opt ions. <br /> <br />For both on- farm and <br /> <br />off-farm systems a loading factor of 2.4 tons/acre-foot was used to determine <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />salt reduction. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II-3 <br /> <br />r. .' ~, <br />L: :.1 . ti ~ , <br /> <br />I <br />