Laserfiche WebLink
<br />003099 <br /> <br />Water Supply <br />, and <br />Apportionment Considerations <br /> <br />SUllunary <br /> <br />Within the Colorado River Basin, present mainstrea::! '1later uses, <br />losses, and required deliveries to Mexico are less than long-ter::! <br />?'rerage annual supplies. However, by the late 1980s, upon the com- <br />pletion and full use of the Central Arizona Project, demands are <br />,,::pected to be approxi:nately equal to the total average annual <br />supplies. Thereafter, as uses increase in the Upper Basin, demands <br />::lay be sustained for many years by gradual drawdown of the large <br />'rolumes of water that are currently stored in the Basin's reservoirs. <br /> <br />At some time after the year 2000,water require::lents within the <br />Colorado River basin will no longer be able to be met by annual run- <br />eff and storage withdrawals. At that time, diversions will have to <br />oe reduced and increases in diversions will have to be limited. The <br />reduction in diversions will occur to the Central Arizena Project <br />and, to some extent, to the Southern Nevada Water Project, and Upper <br />Basin. diversions ,rill be limited and will not be permitted to expand <br />beyond that which would be in compliance with the terms of the <br />Colorado River Compact. <br /> <br />However, through au;;mentation of the Colorado River so as to <br />enable the United States to assume the responsibility, as defined <br />by the Congress, for delivery to Mexico of Colorado River water <br />pursuant to the Mexican Water Treaty, much of these reductions and <br />limitations will be overcome. At this time, the possibility of <br />augmenting the Colorado River by transbasin diversion appears to <br />be infeasible, and the only t'fO alternatives that currently appear <br />to be viable are cloud seeding to increase precipitation and vege- <br />tative management to increase the proportion of snowfall t~4t ends <br />up as runoff. Preliminary studies indicate that these t'dQ alter- <br />rs"ives could together augment tl:.e '.vater s'lpply available in the <br />COlorado River by the quantity specified by CQngress. <br /> <br />Water Supply and Requirements <br /> <br />The future water supply of a river that fluctuates in flow as <br />widely as the Colorado cannot be predicted with complete confidence. <br />Whhin that limitation, however, and considering all available in- <br />formation, it appears that the dependable long-term average annual <br /> <br />C-17 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />" <br />