My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08870
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08870
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:58 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:19:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.470
Description
Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/4/1980
Author
PSIAC
Title
Minutes of the 80-2 Meeting - September 4-5 1980
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PART C-2 <br /> <br />PLANNING FOR WATER YIELD IMPROVEMENT <br />ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION <br />USDA, .FOREST SERVI CE <br /> <br />I NTRODUCTI ON <br /> <br />We appreciate being asked to participate in your meetings. It's a pleasure <br />to present to you a progress report on Forest Service Planning ~ which I <br />believe will be of interest to you. <br /> <br />REGIONAL PLANNING <br /> <br />At one of your recent meetings, you were briefed on Forest Service <br />planning procedures. Two parts of these procedures have now been going <br />on simultaneously. Forest Plans - and a Regional Plan - are under development. <br />Both of these plans will set new direction for short- and long-range <br />managemenf of the Region's resources. We are re-evaluating demands and <br />supply, and we're looking at the suitability of the forests and range- <br />lands to meet the demands for all resources' in an economically and en- <br />vironmentally sound manner. <br /> <br />I'm optimistic that environmental capabilities and land use suitabilities <br />can be matched in an artful way to meet local, Regional, and National needs. <br />I say in an artful way because there are two long-term mandates that must <br />be matched for each planning venture to meet long-term goals and immediate <br />objectives. The first Chief of the Forest Service, Gifford Pinchot, said <br />our mission is, "to provide for the greatest good for the greatest number <br />in the long run." Over the years, the Forest Service ha~ taken that <br />charge seriously. However, we do not interpret it to mean that we can or <br />should produce everything anyone might desire. This relates to the second <br />mandate that we have 1 ived with during the past 75 years which says that <br />whatever we do to satisfy'our'many public, "we will not lower the productive <br />capacity of the land to produce in perpetuity;" The pressures of increasing <br />public demands for goods and services, some of which are conflicting, makes <br />it more dtfficult to satisfy while protecting and enhancing the renewable <br />resources. In this context, let's examine progress in Regional Planning <br />fi rstand then Forest Planni ng. <br /> <br />REGIONAL PLAN <br /> <br />The Rocky Mountain Region will soon submit to the Chief of the Forest <br />Service an assessment of the Region's management situation. This assess- <br />ment is the result of interactions by technical specialists from our <br />Regional Office, the RockyJ10untain Research Station,representatives <br />from State and local government, and other interested parties. <br /> <br />Fo 11 owi nga peri od of pu bl i c i nvol vement. whi ch i ncl uded your concerns. <br />ten planning questions evolved for this Regional Plan. I'll not review <br /> <br />C-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.