Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I.... t. (f. <br /> <br />TABLE 4 <br /> <br />STORAGE CAPACITY <br /> <br />Site <br /> <br />Capacity (Ac-Ft) <br /> <br />200,000 <br />2,800,000 <br /> <br />1,500,000 <br /> <br />1,100,000 <br /> <br />Oes Arc (White River) <br />Saline (Arkansas River) <br /> <br />Tulip (Ouachita River) <br />Bodcau (Red River) <br /> <br />Naples (Sulphur River) <br /> <br />2,100,000 <br />1,500,000 <br /> <br />Carthage (Sabine River) <br /> <br />After the base flow for each selected source was determined, the <br />water available for transport was estimated as the difference between <br />the estimated total water for each source less the base flow for that <br />source. These additional flows were used in computing the size for a <br />temporary water storage facility. After this determination, a maximum <br />water yield for the temporary water storage facility was computed. <br />The yield of the temporary water storage facilities was based on <br />graphical relationships between base flow, yield, storage, and pumping <br />rates developed by SWO. These relationships were developed using <br />simulated daily flows from a 25 year period of record. <br />These maximum source yields are shown in Table 5. <br /> <br />TABLE 5 <br />MAXIMUM SOURCE YIELO <br /> <br /> Yield <br />Source (Ac-Ft/Year) <br />White River 3,480,000 <br />Arkansas River 3,110,000 <br />Ouachita River 1,220,000 <br />i <br />i <br />Red River 1,300,000 <br />Sulphur River 1,090,000 <br />Sabine River 710,000 <br /> <br />015 <br />