Laserfiche WebLink
<br />., <br /> <br />00513 <br /> <br />GCD-AMP. One outcome of the workshop was a recounting of the history of tribal <br />monitoring within the GCD-AMP, and the processes and internal deliberations that led to <br />the current configuration of the various tribal monitoring programs. In FY06, GCMRC <br />will continue to work with the Tribes to implement workshop results and modifying <br />current protocols necessary to meet the specific needs of the GCD-AMP. As a step in <br />this direction, the following proposed project will result in three synthetic reports, one <br />from each of the tribes (Hopi, Hualapai, and Southern Paiute) currently engaged in <br />actively monitoring resources in the CRE. The reports will summarize the results of <br />tribal monitoring conducted since completion of the GCD-EIS and provide the GCD- <br />AMP with a formal assessment of resource conditions from individual tribes' <br />perspectives, based on the past ten years of tribal monitoring work in the CRE. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Manae:ement Obiectives Re: Monitorine: TCPs and other Trihallv Valued Resources <br /> <br />MO# <br />11.1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />11.2 <br /> <br />CMIN # <br />11. 1.1 <br /> <br />11. 1.3 <br /> <br />11.1.4 <br /> <br />11.2.1 <br /> <br />Objective <br />Preserve historic properties in the area of potential effect via protection, <br />management, and/or treatment (e.g. data recovery) for the purpose of federal <br />agency compliance with NHP A and GCD-AMP compliance with GCP A. <br />Preserve resource integrity and cultural values of traditionally important <br />resources within the Colorado River Ecosystem. <br /> <br />Question <br />Determine the status of historic properties under Record of Decision <br />operations. (l1.l.la. Determine periodically whether the essential physical <br />features are visible enough to convey their integrity or retain their <br />information potential) <br />What are the thresholds for impacts that threaten the integrity and eligibility <br />of historic properties? (l1.1.3a. Are the current monitoring programs <br />collecting the necessary information to assess resource integrity?) <br />How effective is monitoring, and what are the appropriate strategies to <br />capture change at an archaeological site - qualitative, quantitative? <br />Are the traditionally important resources and locations for each tribe and <br />other groups being affected? <br /> <br />Proposed Program: At a workshop sponsored by GCMRC in April 2005, tribal <br />representatives from Hopi, Hualapai and the Southern Paiute Consortium collaborated <br />with facilitators from Northern Arizona University's Center for Sustainable <br />. Environments to assess their current monitoring programs in terms of their relevance to <br />