My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08865
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08865
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:19:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10.B
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell-Glen Canyon Adaptive Management-TWG
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/10/2005
Title
Fiscal Year 2006-Monitoring and Research Work Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />;. <br /> <br />, , <br /> <br />1- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />00495 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />completion of the fine-sediment change detection project to finalize work relatcd to monitoring <br />and research related to the November 2004 Experimental High-Flow test. This work includes <br />studies to better document the fate of new sand bar deposits with respect to reworking by wind <br />and verification of a one-dimensional sand routing model. <br />Two Budget Scenarios (and Potential for Experimental Fund) - The draft budget <br />associated with the GCMRC's experimental treatment recommendation is shown in <br />APPENDIX A. At the March 2005, meeting of the AMWG, members passed a motion <br />requesting the GCMRC and the Budget ad hoc group to develop an alternative "Non- <br />Experimental" version of the FY 2006 budget. This version of the budget has been created <br />(without implementation of either of the above recommended treatments) and through this <br />approach, an experimental carry-forward fund of just over $1,000,000 can be generated. The <br />GCMRC and the Budget ad hoc also resolved an experimental carry-forward of about $600,000, <br />within the "With-Experiment" version of the budget. These carry-forward strategies werc <br />intended to: I) provide a new experimental fund to support implementation of the next phase of <br />experimental work, perhaps as early as FY 2007 and 2) allow a period of reduced science <br />activities in FY 2006, while the strategic Science Implementation Plan is completcd; including <br />sub-elements related to monitoring and research approved by AMWG. <br />The alternative draft budget associated with the AMWG's request for a NON- <br />experimental work plan and budget recommendation is shown in APPENDIX C. The <br />identified carry-forward amount to support future experimental work in FY 2007-08, is projected <br />to be approximately $1,000,000 in this non-experimental scenario. <br />Identified Priorities & I<:xpansion ofSocio-Cultural Program - This theme was <br />seriously embraced by the GCMRC during development of the FY 2006 work plan, in response <br />to priorities identified by the AMWG at their August 2004 meeting. The desire to increase the <br />available information related to recreational and culture resources was identified as second only <br />to fishery objectives by members of the GCD-AMP, with the need to complete other research <br />activities, including experimentation. However, the identified need to complete science planning <br />activities in FY 2006, as well as the projected costs for full implementation of new socio-cultural <br />activities caused the Budget ad hoc and thc GCMRC to recommend limiting startup of new <br />research and monitoring activities (campsite and tribal values) during FY 2006, until the <br />Strategic Science Implementation Plan and its various sub-elements for research and monitoring, <br /> <br />GCMRC FY2006 Annual Work Plan (Dra'ft June 10,2005) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.