My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08841
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP08841
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 8:52:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:17:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.200
Description
Section D General Studies-Energy
Date
8/8/1974
Author
Helene C Monberg
Title
Energy-Oil Shale-Western Resources Wrap Up-Series X No 32-Water for Energy in Upper Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br /> <br />. ,.J' <br /> <br />4-wRW washn x x x press <br />briefing here on Aug. 6. "We are a long ways from finalizing a ,reather <br />modification program," he stated, addinc:% that his Cammittee has no plan <br />, acre-reel: 1n tne pper BaS1n <br />to speed up the program. The Team goal was SOO,OOO/annually by 2000. <br />1Por the team saw weather 'mod I as the best bet for augmenting the <br />water supply for the Upper Basin, combined with the development of SOIlle <br />9':othermal resources for both water and power, and a dual-purpose nucle.- <br />ar-power sea-water desalting plant to supp*nt water supplies in the <br />lower Colorado River Basin. It expressed the hope that lower Basin geo- <br />thermal and desalting developments could reduce the Lower Basin's de- <br />mands on the Colorado River, "thus allowing the Upper Basin to retain <br />additional amounts of the River's natural water supply for its use." <br />This has been proposed for many years, but for cost reasons and politi- <br />cal reasons, the idea has never gotten anywhere. Costs of desalting <br />sea water and geothermal brines are not cheap, even in large volumes, <br />the Team noted. <br /> <br />It said there are several closed basins within the Upper Basin <br />which contain ground water which could be "mined." Los Angeles might <br />use more water from the northern part of california or desalt sea water <br />and salt Lake City might use water from Bear River in nathern Utah to <br />cut down on their dependence on COlorado River water, the Team suggest- <br /> <br />0193 <br />I <br /> <br />ed. And there are the possibilities of imports from "areas of possible <br />surplus," it said rather hesitantly, as Jackson is totally opposed to <br />the Colorado River Basin looking to the pacifia Northwest for meeting <br />the Colorado River deficits. <br />other steps that might be taken include use of air cooling (despUe <br />rather <br />its higher cost)/than water cooaing in new plant designs, transfer of <br />water rights from agricultural use to industrial use, and getting a <br />better "fix" on water demand by striking abandoned, stale and inactive <br />water rights off the books by state engineers, by realistically assess- <br />ing the water requirements for Indian tribes and f;lderal lands and for <br />meeting the needs of the 1972 Clean lVater Act. the Team stated. The <br />team is made up of nine Interior bureaus and agencies. It is chaired <br />by Kenneth o. I<auffman of the Bureau of Reclamation and headquartered <br />in Denver. HCM ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.