Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br />~) <br /> <br />PARSHALL PROJECT. COLORADO <br /> <br />The topsoil is dark brown to black and ranges from 6 to 12 inches <br />in depth. The subsoils are brown to reddish-brmm clay loams generally <br />more than 5 feet deep over gravels or parent material. Alkalinity and <br />salini ty are very low and did not cause any of the lands surveyed to be <br />classified as nonarable. <br /> <br />The lands have good drainage characteristics such as deep under- <br />lying gravels, many natural drainage channels, relatively steep topog- <br />raphy, and elevated positions. lJ'dnor drainage-deficient areas may <br />develop under project operation, however, so that some artificial drains <br />were anticipated in making project cost estimates. <br /> <br />The arable acreages determined by the 1951 land classification sur- <br />vey were adjusted for use in the present study. First, all 1951 arable <br />acreages Were reduced 10 percent to allow for reductions that might <br />result from a detailed classification to current standards; secondly, <br />the 3,960 acres under the Big Lake ditch to which irrigation is currently <br />being extended w'ere changed from "full irrigation service" to "supplemental <br />irrigation service" designation; thirdly, since no class 3 lands were <br />identified in the 1951 survey but all arable lands below class 2 were <br />identified as class 4, it was now assumed that half of the class 4 lands <br />would meet class 3 standards. The adjusted arable land acreages are tab- <br />ulated by service areas on the fOllowing page. Lands tabulated as being <br />in the Blue River and Sylvan areas are not included in the development <br />plans of this report. All other land areas are in the project plans, as <br />was previously indicated, but not all lands in each area would be served <br />under either of the plans. <br /> <br />Water Supply <br /> <br />The amount of water available for the Parshall project is dependent <br />upon the outcome of pending water right adjudications as explained in <br />the introduction to this report. The two project plans presented, as <br />previously expla.ined, are based on favorable and unfavorable court rul- <br />ings, respectively, to project sponsors. <br /> <br />Water resources <br /> <br />, <br />l'iater supply studies made for this report '.ere based on runoff for <br />the la-year period 1951 through 1960. This period includes the criti- <br />cally dry years of 1954, 1955. and 1956, as well as the high runoff <br />years of 1952 and 1957. The period is considered to be a conservative <br />base for the estima.tes of streamflows tha.t ma.;y- be expected in the future. <br /> <br />SevElral stream-eaging stations were operated during all or part of <br />the period of study. Locations of these stations and of other discon- <br />tinued stations are shown on the frontispiece map. PeriOdS for 1Vhich <br />runoff records are available at each station are shown on page 10. <br /> <br />8 <br />