My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08835
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08835
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:50 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:17:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.100
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - NRCS-Ft Lyon Canal Co Limestone Graveyard Creeks
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
6/2/1993
Author
Gronning Engineering
Title
Ft Lyon Canal Company Water Transfer Alternatives Study Phase I Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />0083 <br /> <br />The capacity of the Ft.. Lyon Canal above the Kickingbird bifurcation has been reported to be <br />approximately 1,800 cfs. Downstream from the bifurcation structure the capacity has been reported <br />to range from approximately 1,500 cis to approximately 600 cis. A Parshall measuring flume has been <br />constructed on the Ft. Lyon Canal about two miles downstream from the diversion dam. The flume <br />measures diversions that are both Ft. Lyon direct flow priorities and diversions for the Great Plains <br />Reservoir system (Tipton and Kalmbach 1987). In its 1989-1990 investigation ofthe Fort Lyon Canal <br />system, the USGS calculated the flow rates of the Ft. Lyon Canal at several locations. Although their <br />data are not conclusive, it appears that the present capacity of the Ft. Lyon Canal is less than stated <br />in prior engineering reports. (Dash 1993) <br /> <br />The Ft. Lyon Storage Canal delivers water from its headgate located on the north bank of the Arkansas <br />River about three miles east of Manzanola to Horse Creek Reservoir and Adobe Creek Reservoir. The <br />capacity of the canal has been reported to be approximately 2,000 cis. The distance from its point of <br />diversion at the Arkansas River to Horse Creek Reservoir is approximately 33 miles and the canal <br />length to Adobe Creek Reservoir is approximately 45 miles. In addition, water for storage may be <br />obtained from both Horse Creek and Adobe Creek. Water in Horse Creek Reservoir is released into <br />the Horse Creek Outlet Canal and delivered to the Ft. Lyon Canal at a point approximately 16 miles <br />downstream from the Ft. Lyon Canal headgate. Water is released from Adobe Creek Reservoir into <br />Adobe Creek through the Adobe Creek Outlet Canal approximately 2.5 miles in length and then enters <br />the Ft. Lyon Canal approximately 23 miles downstream from the headgate. The storage water is used <br />to supplement water delivered under the direct flow priorities. (Tipton and Kalmbach 1987) <br /> <br />Losses in the system have been estimated to be 17% for the Fort Lyon storage canal, 30% for the Fort <br />Lyon Canal and 10% for the laterals. A portion of these losses do not return back to the stream <br />system. (Woodward-Clyde 1981) <br /> <br />The Ft. Lyon Canal Company also has constructed Thurston Reservoir (near the lower end of its <br />system) which has a decreed capacity of 1,515 acre-feet. This structure originally was used to deliver <br />water to Amity with Ft. Lyon receiving water from Amity by exchange. In 1984 the Ft. Lyon Canal <br />Company constructed a pump and pipeline on Thurston Reservoir so that the water could be pumped <br />from the reservoir back into the Ft. Lyon Canal. Thurston Reservoir is a minor source of additional <br />supply to the company. (Tipton and Kalmbach 1987). . . <br /> <br />In 1983 the company developed a Feasibility Report for the Rehabilitation and Betterment of the Fort <br />Lyon Canal System (Tipton and Kalmbach 1983). The report was initiated in part to obtain 50% <br />funding for the recommended improvements through the Colorado Water Conservation Board. The <br />recommended improvements and betterments were projected to cost $2,700,000 and consist of the <br />projects outlined in Table A3.1 of Appendix 3. Although the Fort Lyon stockholders did not approve <br />the company's matching share (Annual Reports 1984) some of the improvements were constructed. <br />These include the Thurston pumping plant, headgate improvements and cleaning and shaping the Fort <br />Lyon Storage Canal. Maintenance projects are ongoing in accordance with the funding levels provided <br />by the annual assessments. However, the Canal system continues to need considerable rehabilitation <br />and repair. <br /> <br />3-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.