Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CHAPTER 2 <br /> <br />0066 <br /> <br />ISSUE IDENTIFICATION AND HISTORICAL WATER TRANSFERS <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />This Chapter includes a description of the water transfer process in Colorado by which agricultural <br />water is moved to urban areas. The specifics of the Colorado Water Supply Company offer to <br />purchase shares of stock in the Ft. Lyon Canal Company in December, 1991, are described as well <br />as the response by shareholders to the offer. Issues arising from large rural/agricultural to <br />urban/non-agricultural water transfers are summarized. Details of all significant historical Arkansas <br />River water transfers from agricultural use to other uses in or adjacent to the study area are <br />presented. The thirteen transfers illustrate a great variety of impacts and issues connected with <br />water transfers. Factors which may affect the likelihood of sale of water by rural, agricultural <br />owners in southeastern Colorado are presented. The factors are not dissimilar from factors <br />affecting fanning elsewhere in Colorado. <br /> <br />Water Transfer Process in Colorado <br /> <br />The water transfer process is basically a free market process constrained by the need to obtain <br />governmental pennits and a transfer decree from the water court. The pennit and decree processes <br />mayor may not consider the impacts on third parties. Third parties are defined for this study as <br />any individuals, organizations or elements of the physical natural environment which are not <br />represented as a party to the transaction in a water transfer(s). Such third parties may accrue costs <br />or benefits from the transaction which go unrecognized in the transfer process, including objectors <br />to the transfer in water court. <br /> <br />Water rights may be sold with or separate from land. A buyer obtains water rights (and often <br />associated irrigated land) by purchase from individual water rights owners, who are typically <br />individual fanners. Unlike some other western states, water rights are seldom owned by districts <br />or canal companies. A real estate a,gent or water broker often facilitates the transaction. <br /> <br />The purchase and sale contract entered into by the buyer and seller typically states a price per <br />share or per acre foot of transferable consumptive yield. Often, but not always, the transaction <br />does not close until a water court transfer decree is obtained. The seller usually must agree to <br />"dryup" lands associated with water sold as stated in the water court decree provisions. The <br />contract may specify other obligations of the buyer and seller, and may anticipate conditions in a <br />water court decree. The sales contract may include allocation of liability for compliance with the <br />decree conditions, and related transaction costs, to the buyer or seller. <br /> <br />Typically the buyer desires to obtain a finn water supply for municipal uses. The seller has a <br />fluctuating water supply historically used for fannland irrigation and delivered through a mutual <br />ditch company whose operation is controlled by all irrigators on the ditch. The buyer desires <br />confinnation that a certain minimum quantity of transferable consumptive use water will be <br />available, and that the water will be deliverable to its place of need. In some cases the water is <br />to be exchanged upstream to a storage location and pipeline intake, although sometimes a <br />downstream storage location and pipeline intake can be used. <br /> <br />2-1 <br />