Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Grand Mesa prOject is adjacent to the Paonia Project an<;l the <br />two projects both have project land on Redlands Mesa. Because the two <br />projects are 10cated in the same genera 1 area, have similar soils, <br />growing seasons, and crops, it would seem appropriate to apply the <br />recent Grand Mesa Project agriucltural study completed. in 1969 to. the <br />Paonia Project. Current normalized prices were used in the Grand Mesa <br />Project analysis with an index of 243 for prices received and 314 for <br />prices paid. Three budgets were used to determine the payment capacit'y. <br />Cash crop and purchase calves 45 percent, cash crop and sheep 45 per- <br />cent, and fruit 10 percent. Cash crops used were sugar beets, malting <br />barley, and apples,. respectively. <br /> <br />The 1969 crop report shows that the Paonia Project has 11 percent <br />of its 15,300 acres in fruit which fits nicely with the Grand Mesa <br />Project study. <br /> <br />The size of farms analyzed in the Grand Mesa Project study are <br />all under 160 acres. Fruit farms range from 27-37 acres and cash <br />crop and livestock farms from 120 to 160 acres. These farm sizes <br />are larger than those used in the Paonia Project analysis. No <br />current data on farm size has been compiled for the paoniaProject <br />put it is reasonable to expect that the national trend for fewer and <br />larger farms through consolidation has had some effect in increasing <br />farm size in the area. The average farm size was estimated to. be <br />70 acres in the Paonia Project Definite PIan Report. Small farms <br />in thePaonia Project area do not necessarily mean 10w payment capa- <br />city, especially if the small acreage is associated with fruit farm- <br />ing or ranchetta type living. Either one of these type of farms <br />could afford to pay as much or more per acre-foot for irrigation <br />. water than larger livestock farms. <br /> <br />For the above reasons, the Grand Mesa Project study is deemed <br />. applicable and appropriate to be applied to the Paonia Project. <br /> <br />-......../ <br /> <br />Payment capacity by land class for Grand Mesa Project is as <br />follows: Class 1 - $19.10i Class 2 - $14.40; Class 3 - $9.75. <br />This payment capacity applied to Paonia Project weighted by land class <br />would be $4 per acre-foot of water as shown below. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />Land <br />class <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />Total <br />14.74 = $4.21, rounded <br />3.50 AF per acre <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I',. <br /> <br />.1 <br /> <br />Grand Mesa <br />Project <br />. . payment <br />per acre <br />. ($) <br />i 19.10 <br />.14.40 <br />9.975 <br /> <br />. Paonia <br />Project <br />land <br />class <br />(acre) . <br />3,150 <br />10,020 <br />2,130 <br />15,300 <br />$4.00 per <br /> <br />Percent <br />21 <br />65 <br />14 <br />100 <br /> <br />. Weighted <br />average <br />per acre <br />extension <br />($) <br />.4.01 <br />9.36 <br />.1.37 <br />14.74 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />acre-foot <br /> <br />, , <br /> <br />, . <br /> <br />4 <br />