My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08822
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08822
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:48 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:17:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.400
Description
McElmo Creek Unit - Colorado River Salinity Control Program
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
7
Date
9/28/1983
Title
SCS Analysis of the Karl R. Klingelhofer Evaluation Report on McElmo Creek Salinity Control Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />B. Recommendation Items <br /> <br />1. BR-ses water and salt budget <br />coordination and periodic updating <br /> <br />z. Technical appendix for reports <br />on methodologies and procedures <br /> <br />3. Start M&E activities <br /> <br />4. USD\ fund implementation in FY-84 <br /> <br />S. Expand USDA research to "gray" <br /> soils area <br />6. Initiate information, education, <br /> and demonstration program <br />7. Implement an irrigation water <br /> management (IWM) incentive <br /> practice <br />C. Other Items <br />l. Boundaries of BR/Ses studies <br /> not the same <br />Z. BR draft hydrosalinity <br /> report <br />3. Water (and salt) budgets should <br /> never be considered fixed <br /> because of limited data <br />4. "Salting out" lands has costs and <br /> potential benefits that have not <br /> been addressed <br />5. Cost or cost estimates used might <br /> be too high <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />z <br /> <br />addressing closer coordination and <br />proposing a "continuing planning <br />process" to address new data and <br />information <br /> <br />tedmical backup data has been assembled <br />and is available for review upon <br />request <br /> <br />agree with concepts, but constrained by <br />present schedules and funding <br />limitations <br /> <br />constrained by funding and current USDA <br />schedules, proposing to reevaluate <br />implementation schedule <br /> <br />recommendation will be referred to ARS <br />for consideration <br /> <br />included in implementation schedule and <br />funding scheme. <br /> <br />recognize importance of IWM and will <br />consider the possibilities of an <br />incentive practice' <br /> <br />USDA has more flexibility in addcessing <br />salt'source areas ' <br /> <br />not made available to ses <br /> <br />concur; to be addressed through a <br />"continuing planning process" <br /> <br />agree that "salting out" should be <br />considered further <br /> <br />costs can be further addressed in M&E <br />activities and the "continuing planning <br />process" <br /> <br />001523 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.