Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002540 <br /> <br />1996 Report to the Rio Grande Compact Commission <br /> <br />Bureau of Reclamation <br /> <br />Acequia Madre head gates operated by the Republic of Mexico. The water allotment <br />accounting was accomplished by the districts using their own field flow measurements <br />and coordinated data from all water user entities. Utilizing the summarized flow data <br />submitted by the districts for their areas of responsibility,.Reclamation summarized the <br />end-of-year project water supply use for 1996. Reclamation continued working with <br />the districts to analyze and review District efficiencies with the end goals of improving <br />water use and conservation. <br /> <br />Drainage waters from Rio Grande Project lands provided a supplemental irrigation <br />water supply for approximately 18,342 acres of the Hudspeth County Conservation <br />and Reclamation District No, 1. Total flows out of the project to Hudspeth County, <br />through the Hudspeth Feeder Canal, Tornillo Canal, and Tornillo Drain were 137,683 <br />af during 1996. Under the Warren Act contracts, Hudspeth County Conservation and <br />Reclamation District No.1 was charged for drainage water from the project between <br />March 1 and September 30 which amounted to 70,057 af, <br /> <br />Water flows measured by International Boundary and Water Commission at the Rio <br />Grande at Fort Quitman Station, below the project and Hudspeth County Conservation <br />and Reclamation District No.1 boundaries, amounted to 167,600 af during 1996. <br /> <br />;" <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />Rio Grande Project Adjudication <br /> <br />',~ <br />, <br /> <br />There are currently two distinct legal and administrative processes involving <br />Reclamation with regard to water rights issues on the Rio Grande. One is a stream <br />adjudication within the court system in the State of New Mexico. The other is an <br />administrative process begun by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission <br />in the State of Texas. <br /> <br />:;~:' <br />, <br />" <br /> <br />New Mexico. At the February 4, 1997, hearing in the Third Judicial District <br />Court, State of New Mexico, Dona Ana County, New Mexico, the Judge ruled from <br />the bench denying motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by the United States <br />and EI Paso Water Improvement District No.1; therefore, the adjudication process for <br />water rights from Elephant Butte Dam to the State line (New Mexico-Texas) is <br />proceeding in the New Mexico court system. The New Mexico State Engineer's Office <br />is moving forward in its selection process for a consulting firm to prepare the Lower <br />Rio Grande Hydrographic Survey to be used in the judicial process. While there has <br />been no commitment to be an active player in the hydrographic survey, the capacity <br />of work required from Federal government staff related to the survey could be <br />substantial. Reclamation, as well as the Department of Interior Regional Solicitor's <br />Office in Salt Lake City, Utah, and the Department of Justice Environment and Natural <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />:1 <br />