Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C' ("'J '!) ~~. '.-' 0 <br />Il.i . ....J,. U <br /> <br />1996 Report to the Rio Grande Compact Commission <br /> <br />Bureau of Reclamation <br /> <br />plan. In exchange, they propose that Reclamation stop operating Stages 4 and 5 of <br />the project. While Stockman's Water Company presents this as a cost-saving benefit, <br />the cost of ceasing operation of this part of the project in an operationally ready state <br />has not been addressed. Further, the change in operational flexibilities that may be <br />related to such an augmentation plan has not been analyzed as to true benefits or <br />adverse impacts to the project over time. No specific data has been made available <br />to Reclamation to determine the affects the proposal would have on Closed Basin <br />facilities and operations, Reclamation staff has visited with Stockman's Water <br />Company's water resources consultant and are available to analyze potential impacts <br />when the consultant provides sufficient information. <br /> <br />,I <br /> <br />8 <br />