My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08809
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08809
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:45 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:17:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
1/1/1996
Title
Correspondence regarding the Final Biological Opinion - 1996
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Biological Opinion
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />January 30, 1996 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Another point, Figures 21 and 22, Appendix A, are headed "ALP <br />depletions at Bluff". It is our understanding that the depletions <br />plotted are as determined at site of use and are not routed <br />downstream in the San Juan River. Therefore, the values plotted <br />must not be construed to determine depletion of the virgin flow of <br />the Colorado River as set forth in the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />Compact. <br /> <br />Figure 22 also is misleading in that the chart is intended to <br />reflect the probability of exceedance of the modeled annual <br />depletions. However, the chart headings also apply to the plotting <br />of the average annual depletion of 57,100 acre-feet, which has no <br />relevance to "probability of exceedance". <br /> <br />Page 7, second paragraph. The last four sentences make <br />reference to the current level of depletion of the average annual <br />flow at Bluff being 27%, and that further depletions associated <br />with the project would raise that figure to 38%. On page 21 the <br />draft shows that the post-project depletion is 38% of the 1.9 maf <br />yield of the San Juan River. However, using that same 1.9 maf <br />yield, the current level of development would deplete that yield at <br />Bluff by 30%. The 27% apparently was computed using a basin yield <br />of 2.2 maf. The values on page 7 should be computed for the same <br />basin yield. <br /> <br />Pages 21 and 22. The description on page 21 indicates that <br />16,420 acre-feet of depletion, which we assume is an average annual <br />depletion associated with irrigation, is transferred from the <br />Hogback and Fruitland Projects to NIIP, and that the Hogback and <br />Fruitland Projects are now limited to an aggregate depletion of <br />31,280 acre-feet. This value also is shown in Table 2, in which <br />the Fruitland and Hogback are combined with a listed depletion of <br />31,300 acre-feet. The Table 2 itemized list of depletions is <br />similar to the San Juan Section 7 baseline included in 1991 Final <br />Biological Opinion for ALP. That baseline (1991) was discussed in <br />detail during negotiations of the 1991 Memorandum of Understanding <br />and of the San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program. In <br />those discussions New Mexico representatives pointed out that the <br />itemized list of depletions for New Mexico, i.e., Citizen's Ditch, <br />Industrial Diversion, Municipal and Industrial Diversions, Hogback, <br />and Additional Depletions, were not depletions for individual <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.