Laserfiche WebLink
<br />26 <br /> <br />State Engineer Steven Reynolds before the Senate Subcommittee on Irrigation and <br /> <br /> <br />Reclamation in 1961. In a section-by-sectlon explanation of the bill under discussion, <br /> <br /> <br />he said of section 8, which became section 12(a): <br /> <br />Section 8 of the draft was inserted to give Colorado assurance that all uses <br />from these projects in New Mexico or Arizona will be chargeable to the <br />allocations given New Mexico and Arizona by the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />compact, and that the riltht to use amounts in excess of those allocations will <br />not be claimed under the Winters doctrine. Jre 'reservation theotj or some <br />other theory of water law. [emphasis added] <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Equally suggestive of legislative intent to limit Navajo rights is an interchange between <br /> <br />< <br /> <br />Congressman Wayne Aspinall of Colorado, chair of the full Committee on Interior <br /> <br />and Insular Affairs while NIIP was under discussion, and then-Governor of New <br /> <br />Mexico Ed Mecham in House hearings held in 1961. Mecham agreed with Aspinall's <br /> <br /> <br />statement that "Indian rights as such in New Mexico will be limited to the amount of <br /> <br /> <br />water provided for in the Navajo part of the project."70 <br /> <br />~. . <br /> <br />,-~ <br />;\ <br /> <br />r: <br /> <br />~ -, <br /> <br />-',; <br /> <br />c" <br /> <br />,-'Ii. <br /> <br />69Senate Hearini 1961..2l1lli! note 17 at 32. A similar interchange occurred in 1970 <br />between Reynolds and Colorado Representative Wayne Aspinall in hearings on bills to <br />amend the NIIP legislation to change the project's boundaries and increase its <br />appropriation ceiling. Aspinall asked Reynolds, "Before the San Juan-Chama Navajo <br />project was authorized, the State of New Mexico received from the Navajo Indian Tribe <br />a disclaimer to any use of further amounts of water other than these, isn't that correct?" <br />Reynolds agreed with that statement, that the "disclaimer is still in existence," and that <br />. New Mexico considered the disclaimer "a binding contract between the State of New <br />Mexico and the Navajo Indian Tribe controlling the States [sic] right to use of water <br />from the Colorado River." Nav&jo I~ian Irril:ation Proiect: Hearinl: on S. 203 andER <br />13011 Before the Subcommittee on Irril:ation and Reclamation of the House Committee <br />on Interior and Insular Affiars. 9lst Cong., 2d Sess. 45 (1970) (questioning of Steven <br />Reynolds, New Mexico State Engineer). (Hereinafter. J-Iouse Hearini 1970]. <br /> <br />7oHouse Hearini 1961..sJ.Ulm note 14 at 21-22. <br /> <br />;~ <br />t>;J <br />~? <br />. <br /> <br />"-.- <br />