My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08787
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:39 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:15:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.11
Description
San Juan River Recovery Program - Coordination Committee
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
6/1/2001
Title
Low Flow Test San Juan Test Final Environment Assessment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />719 <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />58. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />59. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />60. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />the San Juan (500 cfs) are not based on the biological needs of endangered <br />fish-the biology committee report includes habitat curves indicating that <br />backwater habitat is maximized not at 500 cfs, but at 900-1,000 cfs. Using <br />the upper end of that spectrum would be more beneficial to endangered <br />fish and better protect trout. <br />Theflow recommendation report for the San Juan River prepared by the <br />biology committee states "Target base flow (average weekly) following <br />spring peak is 500 cfs at Farmington, Shiprock, Four Corners, and Bluff <br />gages, measured as the average of any two of these gages. Minimum <br />release is 250 cfs. The target flow should be maintained between 500 and <br />600 cfs. attempting to maintain target flows closer to 500 cfs." <br /> <br />Have you given some thought to the potential for the spreading oftamarisk <br />seeds during this time period? <br />This has not been considered a significant issue for the low flow test itself. <br />Exposed areas, particularly between Citizen's Ditch and Farmington, may <br />provide a seed bed for invasive species; however, when the short test is <br />completed these areas will be rewatered, drowning out any germination. <br /> <br />Provided the duration of the test and the conditions outlined in the EA for <br />terminating the test are followed, the Fish and Wildlife Service does not <br />anticipate any negative impacts to threatened or endangered species. <br />This comment is taken from a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service letter to <br />Reclamation dated March 30, 2001. The Service was writing in response <br />to a request from Reclamation on potential concerns for threatened or <br />endangered species during the proposed summer low flow test. <br /> <br />Water Quality <br /> <br />Monitoring for key water quality parameters should take place at locations <br />from Navajo Dam to Farmington. Where will this monitoring occur and <br />what type of flow information will be collected (hourly, average, daily: <br />etc.)? Also, water quality samples should be collected from the river <br />above its confluence with the Animas River regardless of the flow at <br />Shiprock, NM. <br />Water quality samples will be taken at Archuleta, Blanco, Bloomfield, and <br />Farmington during the first week of the test. The parameters to be <br />sampled include all those found in the New Mexico State Standards under <br />the Irrigation, Livestock, Wildlife habitat, and Fishery standard sections. <br />They include, but are not limited to physical parameters like pH, <br />conductivity, temperature, turbidity, and discharge; trace element <br />parameters, including most common metals (dissolved, totals, and <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.