Laserfiche WebLink
<br />716 <br /> <br />46. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />47. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />48. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />49. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />instreamflow water right law. Lowering releases to 250 cfs at different <br />times of the year will allow both endangeredfish recovery and water <br />development to continue as well as protect existing water uses. Long-term <br />operations will be evaluated in the upcoming Navajo operations EIS. <br /> <br />The New Mexico State Game Commission is opposed to the test because <br />of impacts to the trout fishery. It recommends that the test be terminated if <br />certain water quality parameters are reached-pH should stay between 6.6 <br />and 8.8, dissolved oxygen above 6.0 mgll, and temperature below 23 <br />degrees Centigrade. It believes that if the test is conducted, Reclamation <br />must be prepared to mitigate for all trout losses to minimize recreation and <br />economic impacts. <br />See response to Comment # 41 describing Reclamation's proposed fishery <br />plan. Input from New Mexico Game and Fish Department will be used to <br />help determine if test needs to be terminated. Reclamation and New <br />Mexico Game and Fish Department will be monitoring the river daily in <br />order to make these determinations. <br /> <br />If monitoring indicates that suggested water quality thresholds are <br />exceeded or if there are trout losses due to stranding or loss of habitat, <br />New Mexico Game and Fish will recommend to Reclamation that the test <br />be terminated. <br />Reclamation will fully consider a recommendation to stop the test from the <br />New Mexico Department of Game and Fish based upon the supporting <br />data and the degree of loss. <br /> <br />New Mexico Game and Fish recommends that mitigation should be based <br />on the number of dead trout observed, whether or not we know the loss to <br />be "significant". A mitigation plan was suggested consisting of stocking <br />at various size fish and at various ratios, depending on the size of fish <br />stocked. <br />See response to Comment#41 describing Reclamation's proposedfishery <br />plan, which is part of the overall low flow test plan.. <br /> <br />On one hand the tests will reveal potential serious impacts from permanent <br />reoperation to 250 cfs summer releases, thereby providing important <br />information; on the other hand we are gravely concerned about the test's <br />adverse impacts to the river, particularly downstream from Citizen's <br />Ditch. <br />Reclamation understands the public's concern regarding adverse impacts <br />to the river, especially downstream from Citizen's Ditch. Reclamation <br />will conduct river, temperature, and water quality monitoring at certain <br />locations along the river in order to identify adverse conditions before <br /> <br />24 <br />