My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08787
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:39 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:15:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.11
Description
San Juan River Recovery Program - Coordination Committee
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
6/1/2001
Title
Low Flow Test San Juan Test Final Environment Assessment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />5. Comment: <br />Response: <br /> <br />6. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />7. Comment: <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />703 <br /> <br />appropriate. This determination is not made until the final EA is <br />completed. Reclamation believes that long-term operation changes <br />involving a 250 cfs release will have significant impacts; however, low <br />releases for a short-term test are not predicted to be significant. <br /> <br />What is the No Action alternative-is it realistic? <br />The No Action alternative in this case is simply not to conduct the low <br />flow test. If this alternative is selected, minimum releases will be 500 cfs <br />rather than 250 cfs during this test period. The EIS on Navajo Reservoir <br />operations would be completed without benefit of observing directly the <br />impacts of 250 cfs summer releases in the field. It is a realistic <br />alternative. <br /> <br />Editorial comments were suggested to better reflect actual language from <br />the endangered fish flow recommendation report. <br />An editorial comment suggested include replacing "implementing flow <br />recommendations" with "operating Navajo Dam to meetflow <br />recommendations". The use of the word "implement" is consistent with <br />the Proposed Federal Actionfor the Navajo Reservoir Operations Draft <br />Environmental Impact Statement as stated in the Federal Register notice <br />dated October 1, 1999. As such, Reclamation will continue to use the <br />word implement as part of the Federal Actionfor this EAandfor the Draft <br />EIS. <br /> <br />A related editorial comment suggested changing the following sentence <br />(found at the end of the first paragraph on page 3 of the draft EA) from "It <br />is the position of the SJBRIP that these flow recommendations are <br />necessary to protect and improve habitat of endangered fish in the San <br />Juan River" to "It is believed by the SJBRIP that the flow <br />recommendations will protect and improve habitat needed to recover <br />endangered fish populations in the San Juan River." The final EA will <br />reflect this change. <br /> <br />The City of Farmington opposes any operation which would result in <br />releases below 500 cfs, but does not oppose a 5 - 10 day test which will <br />demonstrate the many harmful effects of a 250 cfs release. <br />The City believes that the low flow release test of 250 cfs will demonstrate <br />the many harmful effects of low flow releases. The City plans to actively <br />participate in the test, with their engineer being the point of contact. The <br />City also plans to do cross section elevations of the river, water quality <br />testing, and take video footage. The City will also operate their power <br />plant during the test, to better determine if the low releases will damage <br />their power facilities. <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.