Laserfiche WebLink
<br />03cr331 <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON PEOPLE <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />storage were the main sources of water used <br />to meet the public's demands. <br />It was not until the winter of 1976-77 that <br />many public entities realized that a serious <br />drought was imminent. Water managers ap- <br />pealed to the public to conserve water and to <br />voluntarily reduce water use by 10 percent. <br />Suggestions were offered on how to save <br />water, some utilities furnished flow restrictors <br />for showers and faucets, and the news media <br />cooperated by publishing or televising pictures <br />of reservoirs with very little water and by <br />keeping the public informed. <br />A small percentage of the public seems to <br />be very skeptical of any warnings about hydro- <br />logic phenomena that are usually considered <br />natural, whether they are floods or droughts. <br />Some people reacted by claiming that there <br />was no serious drought and that one group or <br />another was putting out propaganda to further <br />its own motives. As the drought worsened, <br />most skeptics became believers. <br />Sometime during the period February-April <br />1977, mandatory water rationing was imposed <br />in many areas, and additional water districts <br />established reduced quotas during the summer. <br />An allowance of 75 percent of the amount used <br />during the same billing period in 1976 was <br />fairly common, and other rations ranged from <br />30 to 90 percent. Users were warned once or <br />twice if they exceeded their allowance. The <br />next time they were penalized or fined for any <br />overuse; and in a few homes, flow restrictors <br />were installed so that it took 20 minutes to <br />draw water for a bath. <br />Typically, a few people made light of the <br />drought. There were jokes about when or <br />where one should use or not use water and <br />stories of unique situations that no one could <br />foresee. Someone suggested that you should <br />shower with a friend to conserve water! A <br />suburbanite drove to his club in San Francisco <br />to shower before going to work, thus shifting <br />his water use from his allotment to someone <br />else's. And one citizen claimed the drought in <br />California was caused by the rain in California <br />which is only half as wet as rain should be! <br />In spite of the carefree attitude and the <br />people who would rather pay fines than curtail <br />their water use, water use was reduced signifi- <br />cantly and commonly below the ration allowed. <br />Several public-supply systems found it nec- <br />essary to raise rates because their operating <br />costs remained about the same but revenues <br /> <br />were less. The city of Bessemer, in the <br />western end of the Upper Peninsula of Michi- <br />gan, had to import water by truck starting in <br />December 1976, after their wells went dry. <br />The Marin Municipal Water District, just <br />north of San Francisco, Calif., imposed one of <br />the strictest water rationing programs upon <br />their customers when they set a limit of just <br />50 gal per day per person. To ease the water <br />shortage, they constructed a 24-inch pipeline <br />across the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge and <br />obtained water from the State Water Project <br />through the facilities of the East Bay Muni- <br />cipal Utility District. In the interim, entre- <br />preneurs trucked water from San Francisco <br />and other nearby areas to large estates to save <br />the valuable landscaping and to dairies. This <br />was a thriving business while it lasted. <br /> <br />Rural Water Supplies <br /> <br />Rural use of water other than for irrigation <br />is primarily for domestic and livestock use. In <br />1975, 42 million people depended upon their <br />own supply; and they withdrew 5 bgd (Murray <br />and Reeves, 1977), an increase of 37 percent <br />since 1950. About 95 percent of the rural do- <br />mestic water and 58 percent of the water for <br />livestock comes from wells. <br />During the drought, shallow wells went dry <br />or yielded meager quantities of water because <br />the additional pumping from deeper wells <br />lowered the water table more than in the past. <br />Solutions to water problems at many individual <br />homes and farms were not easy, and many <br />were expensive. Numerous wells located in <br />alluvium were deepened when one of the very <br />busy well drillers could schedule the work and <br />a loan could be obtained. In the Upper Pen- <br />insula of Michigan, drilling wells deeper did <br />not always produce enough more water to al- <br />leviate the drought because in most of the <br />area the deeper formations are not good <br />aquifers. <br />More than 1,000 wells in the Upper Pen- <br />insula went dry, and the Michigan National <br />Guard and State Police trucked water to some <br />areas. In several northern Michigan counties, <br />people had to obtain water for cooking and <br />drinking from schools or com munity buildings <br />that had wells with more dependable water <br />supplies. Water for sanitary purposes was <br />taken from streams and lakes. <br />