Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ ~ ~~. <br />t~ '",' '.;' J" !9 <br /> <br />DROUGHT AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br /> ;;;-7 ~ ~ . , <br /> ~ <br /> - <br /> oj <br /> 0 <br /> W <br /> ~ <;) <br /> ~ <br /> C <br /> '" <br /> Q) <br /> ~ ... <br /> m ~ <br /> ... <br /> 0 <br /> R ..., <br /> m '" <br /> Q) <br /> ~ <br /> m .<:: <br /> ~ ..., <br /> ~ ::l <br /> 0 <br /> '" <br /> ~ '" <br /> Q) <br /> ~ - <br /> .~ <br /> E <br /> M '" <br /> ~ M <br /> m <br /> .:I <br /> N Q) <br /> ~ Q) <br /> ~ ... <br /> 0 <br /> oj <br /> ~ ::l <br /> ~ ..., <br /> C <br /> oj <br /> 0 0 <br /> ~ ... <br /> ~ oj <br /> Q) <br /> C <br /> m .... <br /> 00 <br /> ~ Z <br /> .... <br /> M <br /> w I <br /> 00 '" <br /> ~ .... <br /> --- <br /> CD <br /> ~ .... <br /> 00 <br /> ~ - <br /> - <br /> Q) <br /> ~ <br /> 00 <br /> 00 .5 <br /> ~ <br /> t- <br /> m t- <br /> oo I <br /> ~ 0 <br /> CD <br /> 0> <br /> . .... <br /> 00 <br /> ~ - <br /> Q) <br /> :> <br /> M Q) <br /> 00 - <br /> ~ ... <br /> Q) <br /> +-' <br /> N oj <br /> ~ ~ <br /> ... <br /> 0 <br /> :;; c <br /> ~ .S <br /> +-' <br /> oj <br /> 0 ::l <br /> +-' <br /> ~ <! <br /> ::l <br /> - <br />0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ <br />~ 00 0 . 00 ~ ffi 0 ~ <br />M . . . 00 <br />J.33::1 NI '3:)\1:l8nS ONV" or; <br />MOl38 83.l\1M OJ. H.ld30 Q) <br />... <br /> ::l <br /> bD <br /> j:;:; <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />between the actual precipitation and that <br />required to meet the demands of evapo- <br />transpiration is a fairly direct measure of the <br />departure from normal. <br />Palmer (1965) computed indexes for many <br />droughts prior to 1963 mainly in Kansas and <br />Iowa. He concluded that a value of -4 corre- <br />sponds reasonably well with "extreme" <br />drought, and the minimum value that he tabu- <br />lated is -6.2 for September 1956 in western <br />Kansas. Therefore, the values of -7 to -9 <br />determined for the drought in 1977 are rare <br />extremes. In fact, early editions of maps <br />showing Palmer indexes in this range described <br />the conditions as "Too dry to measure!" <br /> <br />Figures 6 and 7 are a series of maps of the <br />United States showing the isopleths of the <br />Palmer index for selected dates in 1976 and <br />1977. As of May 1, 1976 (fig. 6a), the Palmer <br />index indicated severe drought conditions only <br />in California and western Virginia. By July 3, <br />1976 (fig. 6b), extreme drought conditions had <br />developed in California and the eastern <br />Dakotas-western Minnesota area. The severe <br />drought in Virginia had eased, but eastern <br />Maryland and Delaware were now affected as <br />was northern New Mexico and much of Wiscon- <br />sin. These same general areas shifted, changed <br />shape, and enlarged by August 28, 1976 (fig. <br />6c). Early fall rains alleviated the drought <br />conditions in all areas but the upper Midwest <br />(fig. 6d). The lowest indexes computed in 1976 <br />were -6 in California and -7 in South Dakota. <br /> <br />By February 1, 1977 (fig. 7a), the Palmer <br />index had dropped to -5 in three areas of Cali- <br />fornia, Oregon, and Washington and to -7 near <br />the middle of Minnesota and Wisconsin. In the <br />next 3 months (fig. 7b), the index had dropped <br />to -7 or -9 in parts of the Pacific Coast States, <br />southeastern Idaho and in the Minnesota-Wis- <br />consin area. Also an area covering parts of <br />Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming became dry <br />enough to develop indexes between -4 and -6. <br />The July 2, 1977 map (fig. 7c) shows about the <br />same indexes in the same general areas though <br />the index dropped to -8 in central California. <br />By October 29, 1977 (fig. 7d), the area west of <br />the Great Lakes changed from severe drought <br />conditions to normal or even moderately wet; <br />whereas, the drought lingered in a large part <br />of the 11 western states though the minimum <br />drought index was now -6. Shortly after the <br />last map was prepared, rains came to most of <br />