Laserfiche WebLink
<br />j~ <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />/e <br /> <br /> <br />present hopeful outlook toward full agreement being reached 'within <br />thetlextfew'years, full conservation use of the Navajo Reservoir 'Will <br />be needed at an earlier date than he,retofore assumed. For this' reason <br />it is' recommended that the Navajo' Dam and Reservoir 'be eliminated as a <br />unit of the storage project, and that itbeoomea part of the Shiprock <br />Indian Irrigation Project, with portions ,of its, cost,along"with por- <br />tiOlis of the costs of other joint facllities,tobe che.rgedlater against <br />the potential South San Juan and San Juan-ChamaProjects. ' It should, be <br />the first unit of the Shfprock Project to be constructed. In view of <br />the close relationship between the South, San Juan and ShiprookDevelop- <br />ments, it ia believed' to be appropriate to' incorporate them as one <br />project, to be called the Navajo Project, consistillg of two divisions, <br />the Shiprook (Indian) Division and tile Soutll San Juan Division. Tile <br />NavajO Reservoir is, recommended hereininitia1ly as apart of the <br />Shiprcick Division as it is an elisentialintegral part of the Indian ' <br />DevEllopment without which the program tOlllake the Navajo Indisn self. <br />sufficient cannot be fully carried out. <br /> <br />, 15. ' After reviewing the proposed report thll state of colorado ' <br />recol1llllended that the Whitewater Unit 'on the Gunnison River not be,in~ <br />eluded as an initilil unit of the Colorado River storage Project .AI~ <br />though desiring one of the initial units to be located on the Gunnison <br />River, the state at that time had not decided Which of the sevllral <br />possible units should be selected, and ,recol1llllendedthat certain 'further ' ' <br />studies be made of the' Gunnison RiVer Units before 'final selection is <br />made. Further study was given' by the Bureau of, Reclaination to the loca- <br />tion of storage units on the Gunnison River, in accordance witnthis <br />recol1llllendation, and information was made IlNlillable to the State. The <br />Director of the'Colorado Water Conservation Board'has recently advised <br />us that the Board has approved' a reservoir atthiil CUrecanti site wi th <br />a storage capacity of 940 ,000 acre-feet :, andhae urged that this project <br />be included as a part of the initial authoril/:ationoftheColorado River <br />Stor~ge Project.. Analyees of the'Colorado River Storage Project with <br />both the large Curecanti (2,500,000 acre-feet)' and the small Curecanti <br />(940,000 ac::re-feet) are includEld' as attachments to thiS1'eport. Theile <br />analyses indicate that"power 'from either un1twoi.1ldbe more'expe;ls-ive, <br />under present day estime:t;edcosts), thein power>froill al'ternative >sources.' <br />We'believe'that power needs ofthewestetn' elope ,area caijbe,takencare' <br />of, for the time being' at least; by use of enerlWfroll1 the'recoimliended " <br />units. ColoradO 'will need more po~raB well as storage cape.dtyin <br />the immediate future. Ev~y effort sho\.\ld be made to' assure means of <br />meeting that need and to that en4 theCongresslnay wieh to consider <br />authoril/:atioo'oftl\eCui:ecanti 'I)rsome other Storage Unit itf Western <br />Colorado. ' ,,' " , <br /> <br />16 . The states of the upper d;l.v:LsiOi:! Of' theCOlorl;ldo River' BaSin <br />recol1llllended that provision be mede for additional tunds forinvest:l.gations <br />in the Upper Colorado River BaBin prior to the time the inveetigatiQns <br /> <br />-5- <br />