Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'1.", <br />... <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />"TOI <br /> <br />The 'Secretary , <br />Vnder secr~tary <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br /> <br />OOTED STATES, <br />DEPARTlJIENT OF THE INTERIOR, ' <br />OFFICE OF THE SEC,RETARY <br />Washington 25, D, c,' <br /> <br />November 18, 1953 <br /> <br />, Memorandum <br /> <br />,"Fromi <br /> <br />~ ! <br /> <br />'Subject: Constr\1cti,on of DaIrisinthe Dinosaur National ivlonument <br />. . ,. ~ <br />"'. . .," <br />" " In accordance with your verbal instructions: I have'made a <br />studyconce::ning thep!'oposa1to build the Eoho :!\arkDam ,and the Split <br />, Mountain Dam 8S a part of the Upper Colorado River Basin development. <br />The':letwo dams, if built, will be located wHhin the Dinosaur National <br />Mon\llllent" They we:re O)~ig-\.Mlly proposed to be inCluded in the plan of <br />de'relopment of the basin which was prepared by the Bureau of Reclamation <br />. and reo'ommended forappro.,al by the Secreta:tW of the Intedo.' in January <br />1951'- Oppos'itiondeveloped to the constru.ctionof these two dams in the <br />Dinosaur National Mor.timent, and on'December 4: 1952,the'~henSecretary <br />'of the Interior revised his recommendation and proposed that further <br />consideration be given to studi,es of alternate sites. "It, was' under <br />theSe circUlll8tances that you directed me to investigate the matter with <br />'particular reference to the suggested alternate sites, <br /> <br />In connection with this investig~,tion I have reviewed the <br />reports, sought and been furnished data andinfcirmation from both the <br />National Park Service ...nd the Bureau of Reclamation,oonferred wi.'~h <br />various, interested par":.ies and organizations" and have, in oompany with <br />the Director of' +'he Natj,onalPark 'Ser:rice and 'the Commissioner of the <br />Bureau of:Reclamationt perso:w.l1yvisHedthe'two dam sites in question <br />and: inspected a considerable portion of the DindsaurNationalMonument. <br />"I alsoinspectedonthll ground and from the air 'other portions of the <br />Upper Colorado River area. ' ' <br /> <br />The opposition to :the two dams in question arises from persons <br />and organizations interested in the national parks and their desire to <br />p:t:eserVe the Dinosaur National Jvlonument in its present natu::-al state. <br />The Echo Park bam, inpartic:ular ~ will create a large reservoh' wi thin <br />thi,s lvionumen'~and will ce!'tainly,aiter its appearanCe and the existing <br />, conditions, It isa.:matter of personal opinion as to the extent of the <br />ha~ that maybe created by this reservOir. l~ovnifeeling is, that the <br />altel"ation will be substantial and if conflicting interests did not <br />exist, I would prefer to see the Monument remain in its natural state. <br />However~, I do feel that if the dam is built.. the beauty of the park will <br />by no, means be destroyed and it will remai.n an area of great attraction <br />to many people. , '; , " <br /> <br />It should be noted that neither of, these proposed reservoirs <br />win inundate any portion of the quar1'Y where the dinosaur skeletons <br />have been found. <br />