My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08768
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08768
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:35 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.500
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agency Reports - EPA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/1/1978
Title
Implementation of Agricultural Salinity Control Technology in Grand Valley
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The diversified agricultural industry in the Valley is <br />~ comprised of both livestock and crop production activities. <br />C? Slightly less than 10 percent of the irrigated acreage is planted <br />Iv to pome and deciduous orchards, the produce of which is processed <br />00 locally and may be shipped as far as the Atlantic seaboard. The <br />Grand Valley has long been a favored wintering area for cattle <br />and sheep which were grazed on high mountain summer ranges to <br />the east and north (Young et al., 1975). <br /> <br />An economic survey by Leathers (1975), along with the land <br />use inventory by Walker and Skogerboe (197l), indicates that <br />local farming is primarily a small unit operation. The popula- <br />tion engaged in agricultural activities is widely dispersed <br />throughout the Valley with most living on their property. <br />Leathers (1975) determined from sampling about 100 random selec- <br />tions that most farm units were less than 40 hectares (100 acres) <br />in size (Figure 11). Using data supplied by the USDA Soil <br />Conservation Service, a frequency distribution of field sizes <br />is shown in Figure 12. Of the total of 7,870 fields in the <br />Valley, 50 percent are less than 2 hectares (5 acres) in size. <br /> <br />AGRICULTURAL LAND USE <br /> <br />Although the early explorers concluded that the Grand <br />Valley was a poor risk for agriculturally related activities, <br />the first pioneering farmers rapidly disproved this notion with <br />the aid of irrigation water diverted from the Grand and Blue <br />Rivers (now the Colorado and Gunnison Rivers) entering the <br />Valley. Through a long struggle, an irrigation system evolved <br />to supplement the otherwise meager supply of precipitation <br />during the hot summer months. However, the futility of irriga- <br />tion without adequate drainage was quickly demonstrated in the <br />Valley as some low lying acreages became waterlogged with highly <br />saline groundwater. Today, the failure to completely overcome <br />these conditions is still evident as illustrated by a summary <br />of land use in the Valley presented in Figure 13. For example, <br />of the more than 28,600 hectares (70,800 acres) of irrigable <br />cropland, almost one-third is either in pasture or idle. An <br />examination of land use in Grand Valley by Walker and Skogerboe <br />(1971) indicated a large fraction of the l2,000 to 16,000 <br />hectares (30,000 to 40,000 acres) of phreatophytes and barren <br />soil were also once part of an irrigated acreage. Evidence <br />exists that these same lands were once highly productive and <br />subsequently ruined by overirrigation and inadequate drainage. <br /> <br />The various acreages of land uses in the Valley area are <br />shown in Table 3. One of the most quoted statements in the <br />literature concerning the Grand Valley is that approximately 30 <br />percent of the farmable area is unproductive because of the <br />ineffectiveness of the drainage in these areas. Examination of <br />the results presented in Table 3 indicates that 58 percent of <br />the Valley can be classified as usable land. However, only 43 <br /> <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.